mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Label Noise: Correcting the Forward-Correction

arXiv 2307.13100 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training neural network classifiers on datasets with label noise poses a risk of overfitting them to the noisy labels. To address this issue, researchers have explored alternative loss functions that aim to be more robust. The `forward-correction' is a popular approach wherein the model outputs are noised before being evaluated against noisy data. When the true noise model is known, applying the forward-correction guarantees consistency of the learning algorithm. While providing some benefit, the correction is insufficient to prevent overfitting to finite noisy datasets. In this work, we propose an approach to tackling overfitting caused by label noise. We observe that the presence of label noise implies a lower bound on the noisy generalised risk. Motivated by this observation, we propose imposing a lower bound on the training loss to mitigate overfitting. Our main contribution is providing theoretical insights that allow us to approximate the lower bound given only an estimate of the average noise rate. We empirically demonstrate that using this bound significantly enhances robustness in various settings, with virtually no additional computational cost.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.

Builds on

28 of 46 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,183
  3. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,059
  4. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  5. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 942
  6. 2020DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learningcited by 692
  7. 2018Learning to Reweight Examples for Robust Deep Learningcited by 675
  8. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
  9. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 653
  10. 2019Symmetric Cross Entropy for Robust Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 500
  11. 2017Robust Loss Functions under Label Noise for Deep Neural Networkscited by 443
  12. 2020Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labelscited by 416
16 more
  1. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 328
  2. 2014Training Deep Neural Networks on Noisy Labels with Bootstrappingcited by 322
  3. 2020Normalized Loss Functions for Deep Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 257
  4. 2017Decoupling "when to update" from "how to update"cited by 230
  5. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  6. 2015Learning with Symmetric Label Noise: The Importance of Being Unhingedcited by 120
  7. 2021Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Pointscited by 97
  8. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  9. 2021Generalized Jensen-Shannon Divergence Loss for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 74
  10. 2017On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classificationcited by 68
  11. 2020Do We Need Zero Training Loss After Achieving Zero Training Error?cited by 61
  12. 2021Open-set Label Noise Can Improve Robustness Against Inherent Label Noisecited by 59
  13. 2022Learning with Neighbor Consistency for Noisy Labelscited by 55
  14. 2020EvidentialMix: Learning with Combined Open-set and Closed-set Noisy Labelscited by 28
  15. 2020Learning Soft Labels via Meta Learningcited by 27
  16. 2021Consistency Regularization Can Improve Robustness to Label Noisecited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.