mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Provably Robust Estimators for Inverse Problems via Jittering

arXiv 2307.12822 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.CV eess.IVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks provide excellent performance for inverse problems such as denoising. However, neural networks can be sensitive to adversarial or worst-case perturbations. This raises the question of whether such networks can be trained efficiently to be worst-case robust. In this paper, we investigate whether jittering, a simple regularization technique that adds isotropic Gaussian noise during training, is effective for learning worst-case robust estimators for inverse problems. While well studied for prediction in classification tasks, the effectiveness of jittering for inverse problems has not been systematically investigated. In this paper, we present a novel analytical characterization of the optimal ℓ2-worst-case robust estimator for linear denoising and show that jittering yields optimal robust denoisers. Furthermore, we examine jittering empirically via training deep neural networks (U-nets) for natural image denoising, deconvolution, and accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The results show that jittering significantly enhances the worst-case robustness, but can be suboptimal for inverse problems beyond denoising. Moreover, our results imply that training on real data which often contains slight noise is somewhat robustness enhancing.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2023.

Builds on

29 of 43 references.

References · 29

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  5. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  6. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  7. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  8. 2018fastMRI: An Open Dataset and Benchmarks for Accelerated MRIcited by 464
  9. 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 431
  10. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  11. 2018Unprocessing Images for Learned Raw Denoisingcited by 250
  12. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
17 more
  1. 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 211
  2. 2020End-to-End Variational Networks for Accelerated MRI Reconstructioncited by 201
  3. 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 130
  4. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  5. 2018Are adversarial examples inevitable?cited by 113
  6. 2016Robustness of classifiers: from adversarial to random noisecited by 87
  7. 2015Analysis of classifiers' robustness to adversarial perturbationscited by 76
  8. 2020Precise Tradeoffs in Adversarial Training for Linear Regressioncited by 76
  9. 2020Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?cited by 58
  10. 2017Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attackscited by 53
  11. 2021Measuring Robustness in Deep Learning Based Compressive Sensingcited by 53
  12. 2017MagNet and "Efficient Defenses Against Adversarial Attacks" are Not Robust to Adversarial Examplescited by 46
  13. 2019Evaluating Robustness of Deep Image Super-Resolution against Adversarial Attackscited by 37
  14. 2020Improving Robustness of Deep-Learning-Based Image Reconstructioncited by 23
  15. 2022Towards Adversarially Robust Deep Image Denoisingcited by 13
  16. 2021Deep Image Destruction: Vulnerability of Deep Image-to-Image Models against Adversarial Attackscited by 8
  17. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Deep Image Deblurringcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 2.

8 papers.