mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MythQA: Query-Based Large-Scale Check-Worthy Claim Detection through Multi-Answer Open-Domain Question Answering

arXiv 2307.11848 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2023cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Check-worthy claim detection aims at providing plausible misinformation to downstream fact-checking systems or human experts to check. This is a crucial step toward accelerating the fact-checking process. Many efforts have been put into how to identify check-worthy claims from a small scale of pre-collected claims, but how to efficiently detect check-worthy claims directly from a large-scale information source, such as Twitter, remains underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce MythQA, a new multi-answer open-domain question answering(QA) task that involves contradictory stance mining for query-based large-scale check-worthy claim detection. The idea behind this is that contradictory claims are a strong indicator of misinformation that merits scrutiny by the appropriate authorities. To study this task, we construct TweetMythQA, an evaluation dataset containing 522 factoid multi-answer questions based on controversial topics. Each question is annotated with multiple answers. Moreover, we collect relevant tweets for each distinct answer, then classify them into three categories: "Supporting", "Refuting", and "Neutral". In total, we annotated 5.3K tweets. Contradictory evidence is collected for all answers in the dataset. Finally, we present a baseline system for MythQA and evaluate existing NLP models for each system component using the TweetMythQA dataset. We provide initial benchmarks and identify key challenges for future models to improve upon. Code and data are available at: https://github.com/TonyBY/Myth-QA

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2023.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  3. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  5. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  6. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  7. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  8. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,790
  9. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  10. 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
  11. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  12. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
13 more
  1. 2020AmbigQA: Answering Ambiguous Open-domain Questionscited by 390
  2. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 336
  3. 2019Benchmarking Zero-shot Text Classification: Datasets, Evaluation and Entailment Approachcited by 308
  4. 2016Key-Value Memory Networks for Directly Reading Documentscited by 223
  5. 2017DuReader: a Chinese Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset from Real-world Applicationscited by 110
  6. 2018The Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER) Shared Taskcited by 108
  7. 2020That is a Known Lie: Detecting Previously Fact-Checked Claimscited by 82
  8. 2020Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic: Modeling the Perspective of Journalists, Fact-Checkers, Social Media Platforms, Policy Makers, and the Societycited by 72
  9. 2017Quasar: Datasets for Question Answering by Search and Readingcited by 50
  10. 2018Overview of the CLEF-2018 CheckThat! Lab on Automatic Identification and Verification of Political Claims. Task 1: Check-Worthinesscited by 41
  11. 2018ClaimRank: Detecting Check-Worthy Claims in Arabic and Englishcited by 27
  12. 2020A Benchmark Dataset of Check-worthy Factual Claimscited by 27
  13. 2021Overview of the CLEF--2021 CheckThat! Lab on Detecting Check-Worthy Claims, Previously Fact-Checked Claims, and Fake Newscited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.