mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Identifying Performance Issues in Cloud Service Systems Based on Relational-Temporal Features

arXiv 2307.10869 ↗First posted 20 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.SEcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cloud systems are susceptible to performance issues, which may cause service-level agreement violations and financial losses. In current practice, crucial metrics are monitored periodically to provide insight into the operational status of components. Identifying performance issues is often formulated as an anomaly detection problem, which is tackled by analyzing each metric independently. However, this approach overlooks the complex dependencies existing among cloud components. Some graph neural network-based methods take both temporal and relational information into account, however, the correlation violations in the metrics that serve as indicators of underlying performance issues are difficult for them to identify. Furthermore, a large volume of components in a cloud system results in a vast array of noisy metrics. This complexity renders it impractical for engineers to fully comprehend the correlations, making it challenging to identify performance issues accurately. To address these limitations, we propose Identifying Performance Issues based on Relational-Temporal Features (ISOLATE ), a learning-based approach that leverages both the relational and temporal features of metrics to identify performance issues. In particular, it adopts a graph neural network with attention to characterizing the relations among metrics and extracts long-term and multi-scale temporal patterns using a GRU and a convolution network, respectively. The learned graph attention weights can be further used to localize the correlation-violated metrics. Moreover, to relieve the impact of noisy data, ISOLATE utilizes a positive unlabeled learning strategy that tags pseudo-labels based on a small portion of confirmed negative examples. Extensive evaluation on both public and industrial datasets shows that ISOLATE outperforms all baseline models with 0.945 F1-score and 0.920 Hit rate@3.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.

Builds on

31 of 95 references.

References · 31

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,710
  6. 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 818
  7. 2015Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Networkcited by 515
  8. 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
  9. 2018Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholdingcited by 407
  10. 2021Graph Neural Network-Based Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Seriescited by 300
  11. 2018Unsupervised Anomaly Detection via Variational Auto-Encoder for Seasonal KPIs in Web Applicationscited by 223
  12. 2019PyOD: A Python Toolbox for Scalable Outlier Detectioncited by 221
19 more
  1. 2017Positive-Unlabeled Learning with Non-Negative Risk Estimatorcited by 217
  2. 2022TranAD: Deep Transformer Networks for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 211
  3. 2017A Multimodal Anomaly Detector for Robot-Assisted Feeding Using an LSTM-based Variational Autoencodercited by 209
  4. 2018A Deep Neural Network for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis in Multivariate Time Series Datacited by 181
  5. 2020Multivariate Time-series Anomaly Detection via Graph Attention Networkcited by 165
  6. 2019Time-Series Anomaly Detection Service at Microsoftcited by 163
  7. 2021Learning Graph Structures with Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection in IoTcited by 104
  8. 2018Towards Sparse Hierarchical Graph Classifierscited by 100
  9. 2021Anomaly Detection and Failure Root Cause Analysis in (Micro)Service-Based Cloud Applications: A Surveycited by 47
  10. 2023Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformers with Token Gradient Regularizationcited by 42
  11. 2018Anomaly Detection using Autoencoders in High Performance Computing Systemscited by 25
  12. 2021Groot: An Event-graph-based Approach for Root Cause Analysis in Industrial Settingscited by 15
  13. 2022Adaptive Performance Anomaly Detection for Online Service Systems via Pattern Sketchingcited by 13
  14. 2023Robust Multimodal Failure Detection for Microservice Systemscited by 13
  15. 2023Heterogeneous Anomaly Detection for Software Systems via Semi-supervised Cross-modal Attentioncited by 8
  16. 2020Anomaly Detection in a Large-scale Cloud Platformcited by 7
  17. 2021Fast Outage Analysis of Large-scale Production Clouds with Service Correlation Miningcited by 4
  18. 2021Graph-based Incident Aggregation for Large-Scale Online Service Systemscited by 3
  19. 2021Learning Dependencies in Distributed Cloud Applications to Identify and Localize Anomaliescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.