2D, 2.5D, or 3D? An Exploratory Study on Multilayer Network Visualisations in Virtual Reality
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Relational information between different types of entities is often modelled by a multilayer network (MLN) -- a network with subnetworks represented by layers. The layers of an MLN can be arranged in different ways in a visual representation, however, the impact of the arrangement on the readability of the network is an open question. Therefore, we studied this impact for several commonly occurring tasks related to MLN analysis. Additionally, layer arrangements with a dimensionality beyond 2D, which are common in this scenario, motivate the use of stereoscopic displays. We ran a human subject study utilising a Virtual Reality headset to evaluate 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layer arrangements. The study employs six analysis tasks that cover the spectrum of an MLN task taxonomy, from path finding and pattern identification to comparisons between and across layers. We found no clear overall winner. However, we explore the task-to-arrangement space and derive empirical-based recommendations on the effective use of 2D, 2.5D, and 3D layer arrangements for MLNs.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2023.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024MiraGe: Editable 2D Images using Gaussian Splattingcited by 12
- 2024MiraGe: Editable 2D Images using Gaussian Splatting2 Oct 2024