TimeTuner: Diagnosing Time Representations for Time-Series Forecasting with Counterfactual Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning (DL) approaches are being increasingly used for time-series forecasting, with many efforts devoted to designing complex DL models. Recent studies have shown that the DL success is often attributed to effective data representations, fostering the fields of feature engineering and representation learning. However, automated approaches for feature learning are typically limited with respect to incorporating prior knowledge, identifying interactions among variables, and choosing evaluation metrics to ensure that the models are reliable. To improve on these limitations, this paper contributes a novel visual analytics framework, namely TimeTuner, designed to help analysts understand how model behaviors are associated with localized correlations, stationarity, and granularity of time-series representations. The system mainly consists of the following two-stage technique: We first leverage counterfactual explanations to connect the relationships among time-series representations, multivariate features and model predictions. Next, we design multiple coordinated views including a partition-based correlation matrix and juxtaposed bivariate stripes, and provide a set of interactions that allow users to step into the transformation selection process, navigate through the feature space, and reason the model performance. We instantiate TimeTuner with two transformation methods of smoothing and sampling, and demonstrate its applicability on real-world time-series forecasting of univariate sunspots and multivariate air pollutants. Feedback from domain experts indicates that our system can help characterize time-series representations and guide the feature engineering processes.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2023.
Builds on
15 of 73 references.
References · 15
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
- 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
- 2019Model-Agnostic Counterfactual Explanations for Consequential Decisionscited by 204
- 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
- 2018'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage'; Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisionscited by 91
- 2019explAIner: A Visual Analytics Framework for Interactive and Explainable Machine Learningcited by 69
- 2018RetainVis: Visual Analytics with Interpretable and Interactive Recurrent Neural Networks on Electronic Medical Recordscited by 61
- 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
- 2021Do We Really Need Deep Learning Models for Time Series Forecasting?cited by 45
- 2020DECE: Decision Explorer with Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 38
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.