mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explanation-Guided Fair Federated Learning for Transparent 6G RAN Slicing

arXiv 2307.09494 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2023cs.NI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Future zero-touch artificial intelligence (AI)-driven 6G network automation requires building trust in the AI black boxes via explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), where it is expected that AI faithfulness would be a quantifiable service-level agreement (SLA) metric along with telecommunications key performance indicators (KPIs). This entails exploiting the XAI outputs to generate transparent and unbiased deep neural networks (DNNs). Motivated by closed-loop (CL) automation and explanation-guided learning (EGL), we design an explanation-guided federated learning (EGFL) scheme to ensure trustworthy predictions by exploiting the model explanation emanating from XAI strategies during the training run time via Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence. Specifically, we predict per-slice RAN dropped traffic probability to exemplify the proposed concept while respecting fairness goals formulated in terms of the recall metric which is included as a constraint in the optimization task. Finally, the comprehensiveness score is adopted to measure and validate the faithfulness of the explanations quantitatively. Simulation results show that the proposed EGFL-JS scheme has achieved more than 50% increase in terms of comprehensiveness compared to different baselines from the literature, especially the variant EGFL-KL that is based on the Kullback-Leibler Divergence. It has also improved the recall score with more than 25% relatively to unconstrained-EGFL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.

Builds on

21 of 44 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  3. 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 293
  4. 2018Tell Me Where to Look: Guided Attention Inference Networkcited by 168
  5. 2022Split Learning over Wireless Networks: Parallel Design and Resource Managementcited by 74
  6. 2021Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Trainingcited by 68
  7. 2020Explanation-Guided Training for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Classificationcited by 58
  8. 2018Two-Player Games for Efficient Non-Convex Constrained Optimizationcited by 55
  9. 2018Training Well-Generalizing Classifiers for Fairness Metrics and Other Data-Dependent Constraintscited by 53
  10. 2022Going Beyond XAI: A Systematic Survey for Explanation-Guided Learningcited by 35
  11. 2021AI-Native Network Slicing for 6G Networkscited by 31
  12. 2016Data-driven generation of spatio-temporal routines in human mobilitycited by 19
9 more
  1. 2020Machine Guides, Human Supervises: Interactive Learning with Global Explanationscited by 16
  2. 2020Why do you think that? Exploring Faithful Sentence-Level Rationales Without Supervisioncited by 15
  3. 2020Dynamic RAN Slicing for Service-Oriented Vehicular Networks via Constrained Learningcited by 13
  4. 2022On the Specialization of FDRL Agents for Scalable and Distributed 6G RAN Slicing Orchestrationcited by 10
  5. 2022Neuro-symbolic Explainable Artificial Intelligence Twin for Zero-touch IoE in Wireless Networkcited by 8
  6. 2023Explanation-Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Trustworthy 6G RAN Slicingcited by 7
  7. 2019Wireless Network Slicing: Generalized Kelly Mechanism Based Resource Allocationcited by 3
  8. 2021Quantifying Explainability in NLP and Analyzing Algorithms for Performance-Explainability Tradeoffcited by 3
  9. 2022TEFL: Turbo Explainable Federated Learning for 6G Trustworthy Zero-Touch Network Slicingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.