Regression-free Blind Image Quality Assessment with Content-Distortion Consistency
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The optimization objective of regression-based blind image quality assessment (IQA) models is to minimize the mean prediction error across the training dataset, which can lead to biased parameter estimation due to potential training data biases. To mitigate this issue, we propose a regression-free framework for image quality evaluation, which is based upon retrieving locally similar instances by incorporating semantic and distortion feature spaces. The approach is motivated by the observation that the human visual system (HVS) exhibits analogous perceptual responses to semantically similar image contents impaired by identical distortions, which we term as content-distortion consistency. The proposed method constructs a hierarchical k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) algorithm for instance retrieval through two classification modules: semantic classification (SC) module and distortion classification (DC) module. Given a test image and an IQA database, the SC module retrieves multiple pristine images semantically similar to the test image. The DC module then retrieves instances based on distortion similarity from the distorted images that correspond to each retrieved pristine image. Finally, quality prediction is obtained by aggregating the subjective scores of the retrieved instances. Without training on subjective quality scores, the proposed regression-free method achieves competitive, even superior performance compared to state-of-the-art regression-based methods on authentic and synthetic distortion IQA benchmarks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.
Builds on
24 of 78 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,058
- 2021Designing a Practical Degradation Model for Deep Blind Image Super-Resolutioncited by 524
- 2021Bottleneck Transformers for Visual Recognitioncited by 364
- 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 351
- 2019Blind Image Quality Assessment Using A Deep Bilinear Convolutional Neural Networkcited by 301
- 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 224
- 2015Massive Online Crowdsourced Study of Subjective and Objective Picture Qualitycited by 208
12 more
- 2020PIPAL: a Large-Scale Image Quality Assessment Dataset for Perceptual Image Restorationcited by 177
- 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 165
- 2017RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 150
- 2020MetaIQA: Deep Meta-learning for No-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 144
- 2019Variable Rate Deep Image Compression With a Conditional Autoencodercited by 109
- 2021Spatially-Adaptive Image Restoration using Distortion-Guided Networkscited by 77
- 2020Transformer for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 76
- 2021Mutual Affine Network for Spatially Variant Kernel Estimation in Blind Image Super-Resolutioncited by 52
- 2018Hallucinated-IQA: No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Adversarial Learningcited by 49
- 2021GraphIQA: Learning Distortion Graph Representations for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 43
- 2022NTIRE 2022 Challenge on Perceptual Image Quality Assessmentcited by 41
- 2019CFSNet: Toward a Controllable Feature Space for Image Restorationcited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.