mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selective Generation for Controllable Language Models

arXiv 2307.09254 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.CL stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthiness of generative language models (GLMs) is crucial in their deployment to critical decision making systems. Hence, certified risk control methods such as selective prediction and conformal prediction have been applied to mitigating the hallucination problem in various supervised downstream tasks. However, the lack of appropriate correctness metric hinders applying such principled methods to language generation tasks. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by leveraging the concept of textual entailment to evaluate the correctness of the generated sequence, and propose two selective generation algorithms which control the false discovery rate with respect to the textual entailment relation (FDR-E) with a theoretical guarantee: textttSGen^textttSup and textttSGen^textttSemi. textttSGen^textttSup, a direct modification of the selective prediction, is a supervised learning algorithm which exploits entailment-labeled data, annotated by humans. Since human annotation is costly, we further propose a semi-supervised version, textttSGen^textttSemi, which fully utilizes the unlabeled data by pseudo-labeling, leveraging an entailment set function learned via conformal prediction. Furthermore, textttSGen^textttSemi enables to use more general class of selection functions, neuro-selection functions, and provides users with an optimal selection function class given multiple candidates. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of the textttSGen family in achieving a desired FDR-E level with comparable selection efficiency to those from baselines on both open and closed source GLMs. Code and datasets are provided at https://github.com/ml-postech/selective-generation.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2023.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
  4. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  5. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
  6. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
  7. 2020How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answeringcited by 445
  8. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 375
  9. 2021Distribution-Free, Risk-Controlling Prediction Setscited by 288
  10. 2022Calibrating Sequence likelihood Improves Conditional Language Generationcited by 121
  11. 2019Don't Say That! Making Inconsistent Dialogue Unlikely with Unlikelihood Trainingcited by 110
  12. 2018Transforming Question Answering Datasets Into Natural Language Inference Datasetscited by 99
7 more
  1. 2022Selection by Prediction with Conformal p-valuescited by 69
  2. 2019PAC Confidence Sets for Deep Neural Networks via Calibrated Predictioncited by 60
  3. 2021Few-shot Conformal Prediction with Auxiliary Taskscited by 53
  4. 2021Can NLI Models Verify QA Systems' Predictions?cited by 46
  5. 2021PAC Prediction Sets Under Covariate Shiftcited by 45
  6. 2023Learning to Reject with a Fixed Predictor: Application to Decontextualizationcited by 32
  7. 2022PAC Prediction Sets for Meta-Learningcited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 10.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensemblingcited by 114
  2. 2024AI, Meet Human: Learning Paradigms for Hybrid Decision Making Systemscited by 7
  3. 2025MCQA-Eval: Efficient Confidence Evaluation in NLG with Gold-Standard Correctness Labelscited by 4
  4. 2026Online Conformal Prediction with Adversarial Semi-bandit Feedback via Regret Minimizationcited by 4
  5. 2026When Can Conformal Risk Control Certify LLM Outputs? Bounds, Impossibility, and Adaptation for Structured Generationcited by 4
  6. 2026Learning When to Remember: Risk-Sensitive Contextual Bandits for Abstention-Aware Memory Retrieval in LLM-Based Coding Agentscited by 3
  7. 2025Dist2ill: Distributional Distillation for One-Pass Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  8. 2025Towards Functional Correctness of Large Code Models with Selective Generationcited by 1
  9. 2026Capability Self-Assessment in Large Language Modelscited by 1
  10. 2026SCP-NL2TL: Selective Conformal Prediction with Semantic Verification for Natural Language to Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 1
  11. 2026BLUEmed: Retrieval-Augmented Multi-Agent Debate for Clinical Error Detectioncited by 0
  12. 2026Solving versus Verifying: Catching Contradictions in Tax Reasoning Systemscited by 0
3 more
  1. 2026Replay-Gated Neural Execution: Decoupling Persistent Behavioral Specifications from Neural Realizations in Frozen Language Modelscited by 0
  2. 2026Pinocchio: Fast Uncertainty Estimates for Black-Box Language Modelscited by 0
  3. 2026The Commit-Abstain Circuit: Why Language Models Hallucinate Instead of Abstainingcited by 0