mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combiner and HyperCombiner Networks: Rules to Combine Multimodality MR Images for Prostate Cancer Localisation

arXiv 2307.08279 ↗First posted 17 Jul 2023eess.IV cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the distinct characteristics in radiologists' reading of multiparametric prostate MR scans, using reporting systems such as PI-RADS v2.1, is to score individual types of MR modalities, T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast-enhanced, and then combine these image-modality-specific scores using standardised decision rules to predict the likelihood of clinically significant cancer. This work aims to demonstrate that it is feasible for low-dimensional parametric models to model such decision rules in the proposed Combiner networks, without compromising the accuracy of predicting radiologic labels: First, it is shown that either a linear mixture model or a nonlinear stacking model is sufficient to model PI-RADS decision rules for localising prostate cancer. Second, parameters of these (generalised) linear models are proposed as hyperparameters, to weigh multiple networks that independently represent individual image modalities in the Combiner network training, as opposed to end-to-end modality ensemble. A HyperCombiner network is developed to train a single image segmentation network that can be conditioned on these hyperparameters during inference, for much improved efficiency. Experimental results based on data from 850 patients, for the application of automating radiologist labelling multi-parametric MR, compare the proposed combiner networks with other commonly-adopted end-to-end networks. Using the added advantages of obtaining and interpreting the modality combining rules, in terms of the linear weights or odds-ratios on individual image modalities, three clinical applications are presented for prostate cancer segmentation, including modality availability assessment, importance quantification and rule discovery.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2023.

Builds on

14 of 74 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016HyperNetworkscited by 1,003
  3. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 374
  4. 2017SMASH: One-Shot Model Architecture Search through HyperNetworkscited by 200
  5. 2021HyperMorph: Amortized Hyperparameter Learning for Image Registrationcited by 84
  6. 2018Stochastic Hyperparameter Optimization through Hypernetworkscited by 72
  7. 2019Hypernetwork functional image representationcited by 65
  8. 2021End-to-end Prostate Cancer Detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of Attention Mechanisms, Clinical Priori and Decoupled False Positive Reductioncited by 32
  9. 2022ProstAttention-Net: A deep attention model for prostate cancer segmentation by aggressiveness in MRI scanscited by 14
  10. 2021Hyper-Convolution Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 10
  11. 2020Harnessing Uncertainty in Domain Adaptation for MRI Prostate Lesion Segmentationcited by 9
  12. 2021Regularization-Agnostic Compressed Sensing MRI Reconstruction with Hypernetworkscited by 9
2 more
  1. 2022Image quality assessment by overlapping task-specific and task-agnostic measures: application to prostate multiparametric MR images for cancer segmentationcited by 8
  2. 2022The impact of using voxel-level segmentation metrics on evaluating multifocal prostate cancer localisationcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 7.

10 papers.