Single and Multi-Speaker Cloned Voice Detection: From Perceptual to Learned Features
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Synthetic-voice cloning technologies have seen significant advances in recent years, giving rise to a range of potential harms. From small- and large-scale financial fraud to disinformation campaigns, the need for reliable methods to differentiate real and synthesized voices is imperative. We describe three techniques for differentiating a real from a cloned voice designed to impersonate a specific person. These three approaches differ in their feature extraction stage with low-dimensional perceptual features offering high interpretability but lower accuracy, to generic spectral features, and end-to-end learned features offering less interpretability but higher accuracy. We show the efficacy of these approaches when trained on a single speaker's voice and when trained on multiple voices. The learned features consistently yield an equal error rate between 0% and 4%, and are reasonably robust to adversarial laundering.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jul 2023.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2021YourTTS: Towards Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker TTS and Zero-Shot Voice Conversion for everyonecited by 277
- 2020End-to-end anti-spoofing with RawNet2cited by 160
- 2020An Overview of Voice Conversion and its Challenges: From Statistical Modeling to Deep Learningcited by 111
- 2022ADD 2022: the First Audio Deep Synthesis Detection Challengecited by 94
- 2021WaveFake: A Data Set to Facilitate Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 78
- 2021TitaNet: Neural Model for speaker representation with 1D Depth-wise separable convolutions and global contextcited by 61
- 2022An Initial Investigation for Detecting Vocoder Fingerprints of Fake Audiocited by 12
- 2022Deepfake audio detection by speaker verificationcited by 11
- 2022Combining Automatic Speaker Verification and Prosody Analysis for Synthetic Speech Detectioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 8; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarkingcited by 67
- 2024SONICS: Synthetic Or Not -- Identifying Counterfeit Songscited by 21
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clonescited by 12
- 2024Harder or Different? Understanding Generalization of Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 9
- 2024Training-Free Deepfake Voice Recognition by Leveraging Large-Scale Pre-Trained Modelscited by 8
- 2024The DeepSpeak Datasetcited by 6
- 2024Improving Generalization for AI-Synthesized Voice Detectioncited by 6
- 2024Human Action CLIPs: Detecting AI-generated Human Motioncited by 4
- 2025Personhood Credentials: Human-Centered Design Recommendation Balancing Security, Usability, and Trustcited by 1
- 2023Acoustic Cybersecurity: Exploiting Voice-Activated Systemscited by 0
- 2025Personhood Credentials: Human-Centered Design Recommendation Balancing Security, Usability, and Trust22 Feb 2025
- 2024Improving Generalization for AI-Synthesized Voice Detection26 Dec 2024
- 2024Human Action CLIPs: Detecting AI-generated Human Motion30 Nov 2024
- 2024People are poorly equipped to detect AI-powered voice clones3 Oct 2024
- 2024SONICS: Synthetic Or Not -- Identifying Counterfeit Songs26 Aug 2024
- 2024The DeepSpeak Dataset9 Aug 2024
- 2024Harder or Different? Understanding Generalization of Audio Deepfake Detection5 Jun 2024
- 2024Training-Free Deepfake Voice Recognition by Leveraging Large-Scale Pre-Trained Models3 May 2024
- 2024Proactive Detection of Voice Cloning with Localized Watermarking30 Jan 2024
- 2023Acoustic Cybersecurity: Exploiting Voice-Activated Systems23 Nov 2023