The Future of Fundamental Science Led by Generative Closed-Loop Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in machine learning and AI, including Generative AI and LLMs, are disrupting technological innovation, product development, and society as a whole. AI's contribution to technology can come from multiple approaches that require access to large training data sets and clear performance evaluation criteria, ranging from pattern recognition and classification to generative models. Yet, AI has contributed less to fundamental science in part because large data sets of high-quality data for scientific practice and model discovery are more difficult to access. Generative AI, in general, and Large Language Models in particular, may represent an opportunity to augment and accelerate the scientific discovery of fundamental deep science with quantitative models. Here we explore and investigate aspects of an AI-driven, automated, closed-loop approach to scientific discovery, including self-driven hypothesis generation and open-ended autonomous exploration of the hypothesis space. Integrating AI-driven automation into the practice of science would mitigate current problems, including the replication of findings, systematic production of data, and ultimately democratisation of the scientific process. Realising these possibilities requires a vision for augmented AI coupled with a diversity of AI approaches able to deal with fundamental aspects of causality analysis and model discovery while enabling unbiased search across the space of putative explanations. These advances hold the promise to unleash AI's potential for searching and discovering the fundamental structure of our world beyond what human scientists have been able to achieve. Such a vision would push the boundaries of new fundamental science rather than automatize current workflows and instead open doors for technological innovation to tackle some of the greatest challenges facing humanity today.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2023.
Builds on
14 of 89 references.
References · 14
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,042
- 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 765
- 2019Machine learning for molecular simulationcited by 109
- 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
- 2022Toward Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence: Catalyzing the NeuroAI Revolutioncited by 78
- 2021Simulation Intelligence: Towards a New Generation of Scientific Methodscited by 68
- 2016Structure Learning in Graphical Modelingcited by 66
- 2021Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physicscited by 50
- 2020A Survey of Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 36
2 more
- 2023AI for Science: An Emerging Agendacited by 5
- 2021Emergence and algorithmic information dynamics of systems and observerscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 6; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2025Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Modelscited by 14
- 2024Scientific Hypothesis Generation by a Large Language Model: Laboratory Validation in Breast Cancer Treatmentcited by 10
- 2024Oil & Water? Diffusion of AI Within and Across Scientific Fieldscited by 6
- 2025Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientistscited by 5
- 2025Science Is Falling Behind the Frontier: Foundation Model Adoption Across Half a Million Paperscited by 5
- 2024Decoding complexity: how machine learning is redefining scientific discoverycited by 3
- 2025Position: Intelligent Science Laboratory Requires the Integration of Cognitive and Embodied AIcited by 2
- 2023Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Researchcited by 1
- 2024The Use of AI-Robotic Systems for Scientific Discoverycited by 1
- 2025Active Inference AI Systems for Scientific Discoverycited by 1
- 2025Artificially intelligent agents in the social and behavioral sciences: A history and outlookcited by 0
- 2026The Artificial Experimentalist: Discovery and Control of Self-Organizing Phenomena with Autotelic Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026The Artificial Experimentalist: Discovery and Control of Self-Organizing Phenomena with Autotelic Reinforcement Learning10 Jun 2026
- 2025Science Is Falling Behind the Frontier: Foundation Model Adoption Across Half a Million Papers21 Nov 2025
- 2025Artificially intelligent agents in the social and behavioral sciences: A history and outlook7 Oct 2025
- 2025Active Inference AI Systems for Scientific Discovery26 Jun 2025
- 2025Position: Intelligent Science Laboratory Requires the Integration of Cognitive and Embodied AI24 Jun 2025
- 2025Scaling Laws in Scientific Discovery with AI and Robot Scientists28 Mar 2025
- 2025Large Physics Models: Towards a collaborative approach with Large Language Models and Foundation Models9 Jan 2025
- 2024The Use of AI-Robotic Systems for Scientific Discovery25 Jun 2024
- 2024Oil & Water? Diffusion of AI Within and Across Scientific Fields24 May 2024
- 2024Scientific Hypothesis Generation by a Large Language Model: Laboratory Validation in Breast Cancer Treatment20 May 2024
- 2024Decoding complexity: how machine learning is redefining scientific discovery7 May 2024
- 2023Speculative Exploration on the Concept of Artificial Agents Conducting Autonomous Research6 Dec 2023