PseudoCal: A Source-Free Approach to Unsupervised Uncertainty Calibration in Domain Adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) has witnessed remarkable advancements in improving the accuracy of models for unlabeled target domains. However, the calibration of predictive uncertainty in the target domain, a crucial aspect of the safe deployment of UDA models, has received limited attention. The conventional in-domain calibration method, textittemperature scaling (TempScal), encounters challenges due to domain distribution shifts and the absence of labeled target domain data. Recent approaches have employed importance-weighting techniques to estimate the target-optimal temperature based on re-weighted labeled source data. Nonetheless, these methods require source data and suffer from unreliable density estimates under severe domain shifts, rendering them unsuitable for source-free UDA settings. To overcome these limitations, we propose PseudoCal, a source-free calibration method that exclusively relies on unlabeled target data. Unlike previous approaches that treat UDA calibration as a textitcovariate shift problem, we consider it as an unsupervised calibration problem specific to the target domain. Motivated by the factorization of the negative log-likelihood (NLL) objective in TempScal, we generate a labeled pseudo-target set that captures the structure of the real target. By doing so, we transform the unsupervised calibration problem into a supervised one, enabling us to effectively address it using widely-used in-domain methods like TempScal. Finally, we thoroughly evaluate the calibration performance of PseudoCal by conducting extensive experiments on 10 UDA methods, considering both traditional UDA settings and recent source-free UDA scenarios. The experimental results consistently demonstrate the superior performance of PseudoCal, exhibiting significantly reduced calibration error compared to existing calibration methods.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 55 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.
Builds on
55 of 80 references.
References · 55
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
- 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,282
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,080
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
38 more
- 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,327
- 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
- 2017Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptationcited by 1,309
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
- 2017Deep Hashing Network for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 1,181
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,054
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
- 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 918
- 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 844
- 2016Playing for Data: Ground Truth from Computer Gamescited by 816
- 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 682
- 2018ADVENT: Adversarial Entropy Minimization for Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 623
- 2018Learning to Adapt Structured Output Space for Semantic Segmentationcited by 584
- 2018Domain Adaptive Faster R-CNN for Object Detection in the Wildcited by 442
- 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 432
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 364
- 2019Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation via Minimax Entropycited by 333
- 2019On Mixup Training: Improved Calibration and Predictive Uncertainty for Deep Neural Networkscited by 304
- 2018Strong-Weak Distribution Alignment for Adaptive Object Detectioncited by 269
- 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 248
- 2018A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 215
- 2017Multiplicative Normalizing Flows for Variational Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 157
- 2018Flipout: Efficient Pseudo-Independent Weight Perturbations on Mini-Batchescited by 133
- 2020Towards Discriminability and Diversity: Batch Nuclear-norm Maximization under Label Insufficient Situationscited by 133
- 2018Partial Adversarial Domain Adaptationcited by 127
- 2020Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationcited by 123
- 2020Local Temperature Scaling for Probability Calibrationcited by 95
- 2021The Devil is in the Margin: Margin-based Label Smoothing for Network Calibrationcited by 91
- 2020Domain Adaptation with Auxiliary Target Domain-Oriented Classifiercited by 76
- 2017Minimal-Entropy Correlation Alignment for Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 70
- 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
- 2020A Balanced and Uncertainty-aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptationcited by 55
- 2021DINE: Domain Adaptation from Single and Multiple Black-box Predictorscited by 51
- 2020Calibrated Prediction with Covariate Shift via Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 43
- 2020Transferable Calibration with Lower Bias and Variance in Domain Adaptationcited by 41
- 2022Robust Calibration with Multi-domain Temperature Scalingcited by 39
- 2021Unsupervised Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Source Modelscited by 32
50 most cited of 55 All 55 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.