A Dynamic Points Removal Benchmark in Point Cloud Maps
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the field of robotics, the point cloud has become an essential map representation. From the perspective of downstream tasks like localization and global path planning, points corresponding to dynamic objects will adversely affect their performance. Existing methods for removing dynamic points in point clouds often lack clarity in comparative evaluations and comprehensive analysis. Therefore, we propose an easy-to-extend unified benchmarking framework for evaluating techniques for removing dynamic points in maps. It includes refactored state-of-art methods and novel metrics to analyze the limitations of these approaches. This enables researchers to dive deep into the underlying reasons behind these limitations. The benchmark makes use of several datasets with different sensor types. All the code and datasets related to our study are publicly available for further development and utilization.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2023.
Builds on
14 of 20 references.
References · 14
- 2023Argoverse 2: Next Generation Datasets for Self-Driving Perception and Forecastingcited by 701
- 2021FAST-LIO2: Fast Direct LiDAR-inertial Odometrycited by 170
- 2016Voxblox: Incremental 3D Euclidean Signed Distance Fields for On-Board MAV Planningcited by 148
- 2022Not All Points Are Equal: Learning Highly Efficient Point-based Detectors for 3D LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 131
- 2022Differentiable Raycasting for Self-supervised Occupancy Forecastingcited by 83
- 2022Dynamic 3D Scene Analysis by Point Cloud Accumulationcited by 47
- 2022Receding Moving Object Segmentation in 3D LiDAR Data Using Sparse 4D Convolutionscited by 35
- 2021ERASOR: Egocentric Ratio of Pseudo Occupancy-based Dynamic Object Removal for Static 3D Point Cloud Map Buildingcited by 29
- 2022Efficient Spatial-Temporal Information Fusion for LiDAR-Based 3D Moving Object Segmentationcited by 29
- 2022Automatic Labeling to Generate Training Data for Online LiDAR-based Moving Object Segmentationcited by 27
- 2022Dynamics-Aware Spatiotemporal Occupancy Prediction in Urban Environmentscited by 17
- 2020Robust Odometry and Mapping for Multi-LiDAR Systems with Online Extrinsic Calibrationcited by 14
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024SeFlow: A Self-Supervised Scene Flow Method in Autonomous Drivingcited by 38
- 2024DeFlow: Decoder of Scene Flow Network in Autonomous Drivingcited by 29
- 2024DUFOMap: Efficient Dynamic Awareness Mappingcited by 11
- 20243D LiDAR Mapping in Dynamic Environments Using a 4D Implicit Neural Representationcited by 8
- 2024BeautyMap: Binary-Encoded Adaptable Ground Matrix for Dynamic Points Removal in Global Mapscited by 6
- 2024HeLiMOS: A Dataset for Moving Object Segmentation in 3D Point Clouds From Heterogeneous LiDAR Sensorscited by 5
- 2025DOC-Depth: A novel approach for dense depth ground truth generationcited by 3
- 2025HIF: Height Interval Filtering for Efficient Dynamic Points Removalcited by 0
- 2025HIF: Height Interval Filtering for Efficient Dynamic Points Removal10 Mar 2025
- 2025DOC-Depth: A novel approach for dense depth ground truth generation4 Feb 2025
- 2024HeLiMOS: A Dataset for Moving Object Segmentation in 3D Point Clouds From Heterogeneous LiDAR Sensors12 Aug 2024
- 2024SeFlow: A Self-Supervised Scene Flow Method in Autonomous Driving1 Jul 2024
- 2024BeautyMap: Binary-Encoded Adaptable Ground Matrix for Dynamic Points Removal in Global Maps12 May 2024
- 20243D LiDAR Mapping in Dynamic Environments Using a 4D Implicit Neural Representation6 May 2024
- 2024DUFOMap: Efficient Dynamic Awareness Mapping3 Mar 2024
- 2024DeFlow: Decoder of Scene Flow Network in Autonomous Driving29 Jan 2024