Estimating Deep Learning energy consumption based on model architecture and training environment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
To raise awareness of the environmental impact of deep learning (DL), many studies estimate the energy use of DL systems. However, energy estimates during DL training often rely on unverified assumptions. This work addresses that gap by investigating how model architecture and training environment affect energy consumption. We train a variety of computer vision models and collect energy consumption and accuracy metrics to analyze their trade-offs across configurations. Our results show that selecting the right model-training environment combination can reduce training energy consumption by up to 80.68% with less than 2% loss in F1 score. We find a significant interaction effect between model and training environment: energy efficiency improves when GPU computational power scales with model complexity. Moreover, we demonstrate that common estimation practices, such as using FLOPs or GPU TDP, fail to capture these dynamics and can lead to substantial errors. To address these shortcomings, we propose the Stable Training Epoch Projection (STEP) and the Pre-training Regression-based Estimation (PRE) methods. Across evaluations, our methods outperform existing tools by a factor of two or more in estimation accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2023.
Builds on
17 of 57 references.
References · 17
- 2019Green AIcited by 620
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 516
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 264
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 183
- 2022Compute Trends Across Three Eras of Machine Learningcited by 161
- 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
- 2023Counting Carbon: A Survey of Factors Influencing the Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 42
- 2021MixFaceNets: Extremely Efficient Face Recognition Networkscited by 36
- 2023How to estimate carbon footprint when training deep learning models? A guide and reviewcited by 34
- 2023Exploring the Carbon Footprint of Hugging Face's ML Models: A Repository Mining Studycited by 23
- 2021A survey on Variational Autoencoders from a GreenAI perspectivecited by 22
5 more
- 2020Towards Accurate and Reliable Energy Measurement of NLP Modelscited by 16
- 2023Uncovering Energy-Efficient Practices in Deep Learning Training: Preliminary Steps Towards Green AIcited by 16
- 2020The Ramifications of Making Deep Neural Networks Compactcited by 6
- 2022Precise Energy Consumption Measurements of Heterogeneous Artificial Intelligence Workloadscited by 5
- 2021Determining Chess Game State From an Imagecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023A Synthesis of Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systemscited by 17
- 2024Innovating for Tomorrow: The Convergence of SE and Green AIcited by 3
- 2024The More the Merrier? Navigating Accuracy vs. Energy Efficiency Design Trade-Offs in Ensemble Learning Systemscited by 1
- 2026AI of the People, by the People, for the People: A Social Choice Approach to Collective Control of Artificial Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026AI of the People, by the People, for the People: A Social Choice Approach to Collective Control of Artificial Intelligence14 Apr 2026
- 2024The More the Merrier? Navigating Accuracy vs. Energy Efficiency Design Trade-Offs in Ensemble Learning Systems3 Jul 2024
- 2024Innovating for Tomorrow: The Convergence of SE and Green AI26 Jun 2024
- 2023A Synthesis of Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systems15 Dec 2023