mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Measuring Lexical Diversity in Texts: The Twofold Length Problem

arXiv 2307.04626 ↗First posted 10 Jul 2023cs.CL stat.APcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The impact of text length on the estimation of lexical diversity has captured the attention of the scientific community for more than a century. Numerous indices have been proposed, and many studies have been conducted to evaluate them, but the problem remains. This methodological review provides a critical analysis not only of the most commonly used indices in language learning studies, but also of the length problem itself, as well as of the methodology for evaluating the proposed solutions. The analysis of three datasets of English language-learners' texts revealed that indices that reduce all texts to the same length using a probabilistic or an algorithmic approach solve the length dependency problem; however, all these indices failed to address the second problem, which is their sensitivity to the parameter that determines the length to which the texts are reduced. The paper concludes with recommendations for optimizing lexical diversity analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2023.

Builds on

0 of 52 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

8 papers.