mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Optimization-based Learning for Dynamic Load Planning in Trucking Service Networks

arXiv 2307.04050 ↗First posted 8 Jul 2023cs.AI cs.LG cs.SYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The load planning problem is a critical challenge in service network design for parcel carriers: it decides how many trailers to assign for dispatch over time between pairs of terminals. Another key challenge is to determine a flow plan, which specifies how parcel volumes are assigned to planned loads. This paper considers the Outbound Load Planning Problem (OLPP) that considers flow and load planning challenges jointly in order to adjust loads and flows as the demand forecast changes over time before the day of operations in a terminal. The paper aims at developing a decision-support tool to inform planners making these decisions at terminals across the network. The paper formulates the OLPP as a mixed-integer programming model and shows that it admits a large number of symmetries in a network where each commodity can be routed through primary and alternate terminals. As a result, an optimization solver may return fundamentally different solutions to closely related problems, confusing planners and reducing trust in optimization. To remedy this limitation, this paper proposes a lexicographical optimization approach that eliminates those symmetries by generating optimal solutions staying close to a reference plan. Moreover, this paper designs an optimization proxy that addresses the computational challenges of the optimization model. The optimization proxy combines a machine-learning model and a repair procedure to find near-optimal solutions that satisfy real-time constraints imposed by planners in the loop. An extensive computational study on industrial instances shows that the optimization proxy is orders of magnitude faster for generating solutions that are consistent with each other. The proposed approach also demonstrates the benefits of the OLPP for load consolidation and the significant savings obtained from combining machine learning and optimization.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jul 2023.

Builds on

17 of 43 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2018Machine Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: a Methodological Tour d'Horizoncited by 612
  5. 2017Learning Combinatorial Optimization Algorithms over Graphscited by 557
  6. 2016Understanding Deep Neural Networks with Rectified Linear Unitscited by 253
  7. 2020Generalize a Small Pre-trained Model to Arbitrarily Large TSP Instancescited by 161
  8. 2021End-to-End Constrained Optimization Learning: A Surveycited by 154
  9. 2019Predicting AC Optimal Power Flows: Combining Deep Learning and Lagrangian Dual Methodscited by 93
  10. 2022Self-Supervised Primal-Dual Learning for Constrained Optimizationcited by 60
  11. 2023End-to-End Feasible Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Economic Dispatchcited by 35
  12. 2021Learning Optimization Proxies for Large-Scale Security-Constrained Economic Dispatchcited by 29
5 more
  1. 2021Learning Hard Optimization Problems: A Data Generation Perspectivecited by 21
  2. 2021Fast Approximations for Job Shop Scheduling: A Lagrangian Dual Deep Learning Methodcited by 20
  3. 2021Spatial Network Decomposition for Fast and Scalable AC-OPF Learningcited by 15
  4. 2022Confidence-Aware Graph Neural Networks for Learning Reliability Assessment Commitmentscited by 12
  5. 2023Two-Stage Learning For the Flexible Job Shop Scheduling Problemcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

3 papers.