mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Automatic Quotation Attribution in Literary Novels

arXiv 2307.03734 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2023cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current models for quotation attribution in literary novels assume varying levels of available information in their training and test data, which poses a challenge for in-the-wild inference. Here, we approach quotation attribution as a set of four interconnected sub-tasks: character identification, coreference resolution, quotation identification, and speaker attribution. We benchmark state-of-the-art models on each of these sub-tasks independently, using a large dataset of annotated coreferences and quotations in literary novels (the Project Dialogism Novel Corpus). We also train and evaluate models for the speaker attribution task in particular, showing that a simple sequential prediction model achieves accuracy scores on par with state-of-the-art models.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2023.

Builds on

4 of 15 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019An Annotated Dataset of Coreference in English Literaturecited by 58
  2. 2021Word-Level Coreference Resolutioncited by 40
  3. 2020Measuring Information Propagation in Literary Social Networkscited by 15
  4. 2022The Project Dialogism Novel Corpus: A Dataset for Quotation Attribution in Literary Textscited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

9 papers.