mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finding differences in perspectives between designers and engineers to develop trustworthy AI for autonomous cars

arXiv 2307.03193 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2023cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the context of designing and implementing ethical Artificial Intelligence (AI), varying perspectives exist regarding developing trustworthy AI for autonomous cars. This study sheds light on the differences in perspectives and provides recommendations to minimize such divergences. By exploring the diverse viewpoints, we identify key factors contributing to the differences and propose strategies to bridge the gaps. This study goes beyond the trolley problem to visualize the complex challenges of trustworthy and ethical AI. Three pillars of trustworthy AI have been defined: transparency, reliability, and safety. This research contributes to the field of trustworthy AI for autonomous cars, providing practical recommendations to enhance the development of AI systems that prioritize both technological advancement and ethical principles.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2023.

Builds on

3 of 32 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2020Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthycited by 183
  3. 2023Nordic Vehicle Dataset (NVD): Performance of vehicle detectors using newly captured NVD from UAV in different snowy weather conditionscited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.