mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Proportional Response: Contextual Bandits for Simple and Cumulative Regret Minimization

arXiv 2307.02108 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In many applications, e.g. in healthcare and e-commerce, the goal of a contextual bandit may be to learn an optimal treatment assignment policy at the end of the experiment. That is, to minimize simple regret. However, this objective remains understudied. We propose a new family of computationally efficient bandit algorithms for the stochastic contextual bandit setting, where a tuning parameter determines the weight placed on cumulative regret minimization (where we establish near-optimal minimax guarantees) versus simple regret minimization (where we establish state-of-the-art guarantees). Our algorithms work with any function class, are robust to model misspecification, and can be used in continuous arm settings. This flexibility comes from constructing and relying on "conformal arm sets" (CASs). CASs provide a set of arms for every context, encompassing the context-specific optimal arm with a certain probability across the context distribution. Our positive results on simple and cumulative regret guarantees are contrasted with a negative result, which shows that no algorithm can achieve instance-dependent simple regret guarantees while simultaneously achieving minimax optimal cumulative regret guarantees.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2023.

Builds on

21 of 48 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Introduction to Multi-Armed Banditscited by 475
  2. 2014Taming the Monster: A Fast and Simple Algorithm for Contextual Banditscited by 200
  3. 2020Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression Oraclescited by 195
  4. 2016Simple Bayesian Algorithms for Best Arm Identificationcited by 116
  5. 2020Bypassing the Monster: A Faster and Simpler Optimal Algorithm for Contextual Bandits under Realizabilitycited by 114
  6. 2019Confidence Intervals for Policy Evaluation in Adaptive Experimentscited by 95
  7. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
  8. 2020Instance-Dependent Complexity of Contextual Bandits and Reinforcement Learning: A Disagreement-Based Perspectivecited by 78
  9. 2021Off-Policy Evaluation via Adaptive Weighting with Data from Contextual Banditscited by 40
  10. 2022Policy learning "without" overlap: Pessimism and generalized empirical Bernstein's inequalitycited by 32
  11. 2020Power Constrained Banditscited by 30
  12. 2020Efficient Contextual Bandits with Continuous Actionscited by 24
9 more
  1. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Bandits with Offline Regression Oraclescited by 21
  2. 2021Design of Experiments for Stochastic Contextual Linear Banditscited by 18
  3. 2022Contextual Bandits with Smooth Regret: Efficient Learning in Continuous Action Spacescited by 17
  4. 2022Instance-optimal PAC Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 16
  5. 2020An Optimal Elimination Algorithm for Learning a Best Armcited by 10
  6. 2022Upper bounds on the Natarajan dimensions of some function classescited by 8
  7. 2022Contextual Bandits in a Survey Experiment on Charitable Giving: Within-Experiment Outcomes versus Policy Learningcited by 6
  8. 2023Kernel-based off-policy estimation without overlap: Instance optimality beyond semiparametric efficiencycited by 6
  9. 2021Towards Costless Model Selection in Contextual Bandits: A Bias-Variance Perspectivecited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 4.

7 papers.