mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Generic Solutions for Multiphase Transport in Porous Media via the Flux Functions Operator

arXiv 2307.01354 ↗First posted 3 Jul 2023physics.comp-ph cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Traditional numerical schemes for simulating fluid flow and transport in porous media can be computationally expensive. Advances in machine learning for scientific computing have the potential to help speed up the simulation time in many scientific and engineering fields. DeepONet has recently emerged as a powerful tool for accelerating the solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) by learning operators (mapping between function spaces) of PDEs. In this work, we learn the mapping between the space of flux functions of the Buckley-Leverett PDE and the space of solutions (saturations). We use Physics-Informed DeepONets (PI-DeepONets) to achieve this mapping without any paired input-output observations, except for a set of given initial or boundary conditions; ergo, eliminating the expensive data generation process. By leveraging the underlying physical laws via soft penalty constraints during model training, in a manner similar to Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), and a unique deep neural network architecture, the proposed PI-DeepONet model can predict the solution accurately given any type of flux function (concave, convex, or non-convex) while achieving up to four orders of magnitude improvements in speed over traditional numerical solvers. Moreover, the trained PI-DeepONet model demonstrates excellent generalization qualities, rendering it a promising tool for accelerating the solution of transport problems in porous media.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2023.

Builds on

19 of 64 references.

References · 19

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  4. 2020Neural Operator: Graph Kernel Network for Partial Differential Equationscited by 734
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  6. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
  7. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  8. 2020Multipole Graph Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 349
  9. 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
  10. 2019Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracturecited by 116
  11. 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 113
  12. 2022Learning Operators with Coupled Attentioncited by 90
7 more
  1. 2021Improved architectures and training algorithms for deep operator networkscited by 86
  2. 2023Physics informed WNOcited by 27
  3. 2020Physics-informed Neural Networks for Solving Nonlinear Diffusivity and Biot's equationscited by 20
  4. 2022FC-PINO: High Precision Physics-Informed Neural Operators via Fourier Continuationcited by 13
  5. 2022Physics-informed neural network solution of thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) processes in porous mediacited by 8
  6. 2021Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A surveycited by 2
  7. 2023The FluidFlower International Benchmark Study: Process, Modeling Results, and Comparison to Experimental Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.