mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact

arXiv 2307.00361 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the context of Industry 4.0, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning for anomaly detection is being hampered by high computational requirements and associated environmental effects. This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability, contributing to the emerging discourse on 'Green AI.' An extensive variety of machine learning algorithms, coupled with various Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) configurations, were meticulously evaluated. Our investigation encapsulated a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics, comprising Accuracy, Area Under the Curve (AUC), Recall, Precision, F1 Score, Kappa Statistic, Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC), and F1 Macro. Simultaneously, the environmental footprint of these models was gauged through considerations of time duration, CO2 equivalent, and energy consumption during the training, cross-validation, and inference phases. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance. However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised MLP configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption. The study incorporated a multi-objective optimisation approach, invoking Pareto optimality principles, to highlight the trade-offs between a model's performance and its environmental impact. The insights derived underscore the imperative of striking a balance between model performance, complexity, and environmental implications, thus offering valuable directions for future work in the development of environmentally conscious machine learning models for industrial applications.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2023.

Builds on

11 of 31 references.

References · 11

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2019Green AIcited by 627
  4. 2019Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learningcited by 265
  5. 2021I-BERT: Integer-only BERT Quantizationcited by 255
  6. 2020Integer Quantization for Deep Learning Inference: Principles and Empirical Evaluationcited by 188
  7. 2022The Carbon Footprint of Machine Learning Training Will Plateau, Then Shrinkcited by 184
  8. 2021Quantization Backdoors to Deep Learning Commercial Frameworkscited by 29
  9. 2022Data-Centric Green AI: An Exploratory Empirical Studycited by 25
  10. 2022Do Deep Neural Networks Contribute to Multivariate Time Series Anomaly Detection?cited by 19
  11. 2022Energy Consumption of Neural Networks on NVIDIA Edge Boards: an Empirical Modelcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.