Non-Convex Optimizations for Machine Learning with Theoretical Guarantee: Robust Matrix Completion and Neural Network Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite the recent development in machine learning, most learning systems are still under the concept of "black box", where the performance cannot be understood and derived. With the rise of safety and privacy concerns in public, designing an explainable learning system has become a new trend in machine learning. In general, many machine learning problems are formulated as minimizing (or maximizing) some loss function. Since real data are most likely generated from non-linear models, the loss function is non-convex in general. Unlike the convex optimization problem, gradient descent algorithms will be trapped in spurious local minima in solving non-convex optimization. Therefore, it is challenging to provide explainable algorithms when studying non-convex optimization problems. In this thesis, two popular non-convex problems are studied: (1) low-rank matrix completion and (2) neural network learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 250 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2023.
Builds on
25 of 250 references.
References · 25
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,391
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,352
- 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
- 2014Deep Domain Confusion: Maximizing for Domain Invariancecited by 600
- 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
- 2019Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationcited by 232
- 2016Network Trimming: A Data-Driven Neuron Pruning Approach towards Efficient Deep Architecturescited by 221
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2015Data-free parameter pruning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 112
13 more
- 2020The Lottery Tickets Hypothesis for Supervised and Self-supervised Pre-training in Computer Vision Modelscited by 91
- 2015Fast low-rank estimation by projected gradient descent: General statistical and algorithmic guaranteescited by 70
- 2018Data-Dependent Coresets for Compressing Neural Networks with Applications to Generalization Boundscited by 43
- 2016Unified Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Momentum Methods for Convex and Non-convex Optimizationcited by 37
- 2019Stabilizing the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 37
- 2020Consistent Feature Selection for Analytic Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2019Gradient Descent can Learn Less Over-parameterized Two-layer Neural Networks on Classification Problemscited by 24
- 2020Lottery Tickets in Linear Models: An Analysis of Iterative Magnitude Pruningcited by 23
- 2019SiPPing Neural Networks: Sensitivity-informed Provable Pruning of Neural Networkscited by 17
- 2017Learning Non-overlapping Convolutional Neural Networks with Multiple Kernelscited by 14
- 2021Why Lottery Ticket Wins? A Theoretical Perspective of Sample Complexity on Pruned Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2016Nearly-optimal Robust Matrix Completioncited by 13
- 2020Statistical and Algorithmic Insights for Semi-supervised Learning with Self-trainingcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.