mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On Logic-Based Explainability with Partially Specified Inputs

arXiv 2306.15803 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2023cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the practical deployment of machine learning (ML) models, missing data represents a recurring challenge. Missing data is often addressed when training ML models. But missing data also needs to be addressed when deciding predictions and when explaining those predictions. Missing data represents an opportunity to partially specify the inputs of the prediction to be explained. This paper studies the computation of logic-based explanations in the presence of partially specified inputs. The paper shows that most of the algorithms proposed in recent years for computing logic-based explanations can be generalized for computing explanations given the partially specified inputs. One related result is that the complexity of computing logic-based explanations remains unchanged. A similar result is proved in the case of logic-based explainability subject to input constraints. Furthermore, the proposed solution for computing explanations given partially specified inputs is applied to classifiers obtained from well-known public datasets, thereby illustrating a number of novel explainability use cases.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2023.

Builds on

23 of 63 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020What is the State of Neural Network Pruning?cited by 583
  2. 2018Explanations based on the Missing: Towards Contrastive Explanations with Pertinent Negativescited by 262
  3. 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 160
  4. 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 131
  5. 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 100
  6. 2019Pruning by Explaining: A Novel Criterion for Deep Neural Network Pruningcited by 89
  7. 2020Model Interpretability through the Lens of Computational Complexitycited by 75
  8. 2021What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?cited by 62
  9. 2021On Explaining Random Forests with SATcited by 57
  10. 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
  11. 2022On Tackling Explanation Redundancy in Decision Treescited by 44
  12. 2021On the Computational Intelligibility of Boolean Classifierscited by 40
11 more
  1. 2022On Computing Probabilistic Explanations for Decision Treescited by 35
  2. 2021Foundations of Symbolic Languages for Model Interpretabilitycited by 26
  3. 2022ASTERYX : A model-Agnostic SaT-basEd appRoach for sYmbolic and score-based eXplanationscited by 26
  4. 2021Fairness without Imputation: A Decision Tree Approach for Fair Prediction with Missing Valuescited by 24
  5. 2022Feature Necessity & Relevancy in ML Classifier Explanationscited by 23
  6. 2022On Computing Probabilistic Abductive Explanationscited by 18
  7. 2021On Quantifying Literals in Boolean Logic and Its Applications to Explainable AIcited by 16
  8. 2019What to Expect of Classifiers? Reasoning about Logistic Regression with Missing Featurescited by 12
  9. 2020Handling Missing Data in Decision Trees: A Probabilistic Approachcited by 9
  10. 2020Explaining Chemical Toxicity using Missing Featurescited by 2
  11. 2023Algorithmic Recourse with Missing Valuescited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.