mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Nonconvex Stochastic Bregman Proximal Gradient Method with Application to Deep Learning

arXiv 2306.14522 ↗First posted 26 Jun 2023math.OC cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stochastic gradient methods for minimizing nonconvex composite objective functions typically rely on the Lipschitz smoothness of the differentiable part, but this assumption fails in many important problem classes like quadratic inverse problems and neural network training, leading to instability of the algorithms in both theory and practice. To address this, we propose a family of stochastic Bregman proximal gradient (SBPG) methods that only require smooth adaptivity. SBPG replaces the quadratic approximation in SGD with a Bregman proximity measure, offering a better approximation model that handles non-Lipschitz gradients in nonconvex objectives. We establish the convergence properties of vanilla SBPG and show it achieves optimal sample complexity in the nonconvex setting. Experimental results on quadratic inverse problems demonstrate SBPG's robustness in terms of stepsize selection and sensitivity to the initial point. Furthermore, we introduce a momentum-based variant, MSBPG, which enhances convergence by relaxing the mini-batch size requirement while preserving the optimal oracle complexity. We apply MSBPG to the training of deep neural networks, utilizing a polynomial kernel function to ensure smooth adaptivity of the loss function. Experimental results on benchmark datasets confirm the effectiveness and robustness of MSBPG in training neural networks. Given its negligible additional computational cost compared to SGD in large-scale optimization, MSBPG shows promise as a universal open-source optimizer for future applications.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2023.

Builds on

45 of 95 references.

References · 45

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  5. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  6. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
  9. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  10. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  11. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,850
  12. 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 772
33 more
  1. 2019Large Batch Optimization for Deep Learning: Training BERT in 76 minutescited by 674
  2. 2014Convex Optimization: Algorithms and Complexitycited by 575
  3. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  4. 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 307
  5. 2020AdaBelief Optimizer: Adapting Stepsizes by the Belief in Observed Gradientscited by 283
  6. 2019Adaptive Gradient Methods with Dynamic Bound of Learning Ratecited by 183
  7. 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 160
  8. 2013Mini-batch Stochastic Approximation Methods for Nonconvex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 143
  9. 2016Katyusha: The First Direct Acceleration of Stochastic Gradient Methodscited by 135
  10. 2020Towards Theoretically Understanding Why SGD Generalizes Better Than ADAM in Deep Learningcited by 126
  11. 2016Matrix Completion has No Spurious Local Minimumcited by 125
  12. 2018A Closer Look at Deep Learning Heuristics: Learning rate restarts, Warmup and Distillationcited by 110
  13. 2016Relatively-Smooth Convex Optimization by First-Order Methods, and Applicationscited by 108
  14. 2014Stochastic Compositional Gradient Descent: Algorithms for Minimizing Compositions of Expected-Value Functionscited by 95
  15. 2016A Geometric Analysis of Phase Retrievalcited by 92
  16. 2018Closing the Generalization Gap of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Training Deep Neural Networkscited by 90
  17. 2018On the Ineffectiveness of Variance Reduced Optimization for Deep Learningcited by 48
  18. 2017First Order Methods beyond Convexity and Lipschitz Gradient Continuity with Applications to Quadratic Inverse Problemscited by 37
  19. 2019First-order methods almost always avoid saddle points: the case of vanishing step-sizescited by 35
  20. 2018Hessian Riemannian gradient flows in convex programmingcited by 26
  21. 2022Mirror Descent Maximizes Generalized Margin and Can Be Implemented Efficientlycited by 26
  22. 2018Accelerated Bregman Proximal Gradient Methods for Relatively Smooth Convex Optimizationcited by 20
  23. 2021Fast Stochastic Bregman Gradient Methods: Sharp Analysis and Variance Reductioncited by 19
  24. 2017"Relative-Continuity" for Non-Lipschitz Non-Smooth Convex Optimization using Stochastic (or Deterministic) Mirror Descentcited by 15
  25. 2018Fastest Rates for Stochastic Mirror Descent Methodscited by 14
  26. 2023A Unified Approach to Controlling Implicit Regularization via Mirror Descentcited by 14
  27. 2015Ergodic convergence of a stochastic proximal point algorithmcited by 12
  28. 2021Bregman Proximal Point Algorithm Revisited: A New Inexact Version and its Inertial Variantcited by 8
  29. 2021Bregman Finito/MISO for nonconvex regularized finite sum minimization without Lipschitz gradient continuitycited by 7
  30. 2021Implicit Regularization of Bregman Proximal Point Algorithm and Mirror Descent on Separable Datacited by 6
  31. 2020Riemannian Stochastic Proximal Gradient Methods for Nonsmooth Optimization over the Stiefel Manifoldcited by 5
  32. 2021Inexact Bregman Proximal Gradient Method and its Inertial Variant with Absolute and Partial Relative Stopping Criteriacited by 3
  33. 2022A Stochastic Bundle Method for Interpolating Networkscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

7 papers.