Identifying and Disentangling Spurious Features in Pretrained Image Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks employ spurious correlations in their predictions, resulting in decreased performance when these correlations do not hold. Recent works suggest fixing pretrained representations and training a classification head that does not use spurious features. We investigate how spurious features are represented in pretrained representations and explore strategies for removing information about spurious features. Considering the Waterbirds dataset and a few pretrained representations, we find that even with full knowledge of spurious features, their removal is not straightforward due to entangled representation. To address this, we propose a linear autoencoder training method to separate the representation into core, spurious, and other features. We propose two effective spurious feature removal approaches that are applied to the encoding and significantly improve classification performance measured by worst group accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2023.
Builds on
32 of 46 references.
References · 32
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
- 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
- 2016Deep CORAL: Correlation Alignment for Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 1,194
- 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
- 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,010
20 more
- 2022Toy Models of Superpositioncited by 928
- 2019Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inferencecited by 864
- 2018Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Datacited by 656
- 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
- 2022Detecting Twenty-thousand Classes using Image-level Supervisioncited by 613
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 379
- 2018Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning modelscited by 374
- 2020The Pitfalls of Simplicity Bias in Neural Networkscited by 349
- 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 342
- 2020Gradient Starvation: A Learning Proclivity in Neural Networkscited by 262
- 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
- 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
- 2019Learning Robust Representations by Projecting Superficial Statistics Outcited by 123
- 2022Are Vision Transformers Robust to Spurious Correlations?cited by 36
- 2022How Robust is Unsupervised Representation Learning to Distribution Shift?cited by 24
- 2022You Only Need a Good Embeddings Extractor to Fix Spurious Correlationscited by 17
- 2021Failure Modes of Domain Generalization Algorithmscited by 8
- 2019Discovery and Separation of Features for Invariant Representation Learningcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.