mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Analysis of Segment Anything Model and U-Net for Breast Tumor Detection in Ultrasound and Mammography Images

arXiv 2306.12510 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2023eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this study, the main objective is to develop an algorithm capable of identifying and delineating tumor regions in breast ultrasound (BUS) and mammographic images. The technique employs two advanced deep learning architectures, namely U-Net and pretrained SAM, for tumor segmentation. The U-Net model is specifically designed for medical image segmentation and leverages its deep convolutional neural network framework to extract meaningful features from input images. On the other hand, the pretrained SAM architecture incorporates a mechanism to capture spatial dependencies and generate segmentation results. Evaluation is conducted on a diverse dataset containing annotated tumor regions in BUS and mammographic images, covering both benign and malignant tumors. This dataset enables a comprehensive assessment of the algorithm's performance across different tumor types. Results demonstrate that the U-Net model outperforms the pretrained SAM architecture in accurately identifying and segmenting tumor regions in both BUS and mammographic images. The U-Net exhibits superior performance in challenging cases involving irregular shapes, indistinct boundaries, and high tumor heterogeneity. In contrast, the pretrained SAM architecture exhibits limitations in accurately identifying tumor areas, particularly for malignant tumors and objects with weak boundaries or complex shapes. These findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate deep learning architectures tailored for medical image segmentation. The U-Net model showcases its potential as a robust and accurate tool for tumor detection, while the pretrained SAM architecture suggests the need for further improvements to enhance segmentation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2023.

Builds on

16 of 80 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 401
  4. 2022Medical Image Segmentation Review: The success of U-Netcited by 191
  5. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and Futurecited by 104
  6. 2021Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentationcited by 88
  7. 2023Computer-Vision Benchmark Segment-Anything Model (SAM) in Medical Images: Accuracy in 12 Datasetscited by 45
  8. 2022AAU-net: An Adaptive Attention U-net for Breast Lesions Segmentation in Ultrasound Imagescited by 43
  9. 2018A Gentle Introduction to Deep Learning in Medical Image Processingcited by 34
  10. 2020High-level Prior-based Loss Functions for Medical Image Segmentation: A Surveycited by 28
  11. 2021Global Guidance Network for Breast Lesion Segmentation in Ultrasound Imagescited by 24
  12. 2022Rethinking the Unpretentious U-net for Medical Ultrasound Image Segmentationcited by 13
4 more
  1. 2020ESTAN: Enhanced Small Tumor-Aware Network for Breast Ultrasound Image Segmentationcited by 11
  2. 2022ESKNet-An enhanced adaptive selection kernel convolution for breast tumors segmentationcited by 7
  3. 2021SemSegLoss: A python package of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 3
  4. 2022A Study on the Use of Edge TPUs for Eye Fundus Image Segmentationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4.

7 papers.