Dual Node and Edge Fairness-Aware Graph Partition
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fair graph partition of social networks is a crucial step toward ensuring fair and non-discriminatory treatments in unsupervised user analysis. Current fair partition methods typically consider node balance, a notion pursuing a proportionally balanced number of nodes from all demographic groups, but ignore the bias induced by imbalanced edges in each cluster. To address this gap, we propose a notion edge balance to measure the proportion of edges connecting different demographic groups in clusters. We analyze the relations between node balance and edge balance, then with line graph transformations, we propose a co-embedding framework to learn dual node and edge fairness-aware representations for graph partition. We validate our framework through several social network datasets and observe balanced partition in terms of both nodes and edges along with good utility. Moreover, we demonstrate our fair partition can be used as pseudo labels to facilitate graph neural networks to behave fairly in node classification and link prediction tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2023.
Builds on
28 of 55 references.
References · 28
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
- 2018Deep Learning on Graphs: A Surveycited by 393
- 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 265
- 2021Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Surveycited by 261
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2018Fair Clustering Through Fairletscited by 176
- 2020Say No to the Discrimination: Learning Fair Graph Neural Networks with Limited Sensitive Attribute Informationcited by 168
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
16 more
- 2019Compositional Fairness Constraints for Graph Embeddingscited by 126
- 2019Fair Algorithms for Clusteringcited by 98
- 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
- 2019Scalable Fair Clusteringcited by 78
- 2022Fairness in Graph Mining: A Surveycited by 76
- 2020Fairness-Aware Explainable Recommendation over Knowledge Graphscited by 74
- 2021Graph-MLP: Node Classification without Message Passing in Graphcited by 73
- 2019Guarantees for Spectral Clustering with Fairness Constraintscited by 72
- 2015Contact patterns in a high school: a comparison between data collected using wearable sensors, contact diaries and friendship surveyscited by 60
- 2021Learning Fair Representations for Recommendation: A Graph-based Perspectivecited by 50
- 2021Better Algorithms for Individually Fair k-Clusteringcited by 28
- 2020Fair Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 25
- 2021Fair Clustering Under a Bounded Costcited by 21
- 2021Correcting Exposure Bias for Link Recommendationcited by 17
- 2022Robust Fair Clustering: A Novel Fairness Attack and Defense Frameworkcited by 13
- 2017Hidden Community Detection in Social Networkscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Estimating Fair Graphs from Graph-Stationary Datacited by 0
- 2025Estimating Fair Graphs from Graph-Stationary Data8 Oct 2025