mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quantification Aided by Deep Estimations of Imperfection Factors and Macromolecular Signal

arXiv 2306.09681 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2023physics.med-ph cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) is an important technique for biomedical detection. However, it is challenging to accurately quantify metabolites with proton MRS due to serious overlaps of metabolite signals, imperfections because of non-ideal acquisition conditions, and interference with strong background signals mainly from macromolecules. The most popular method, LCModel, adopts complicated non-linear least square to quantify metabolites and addresses these problems by designing empirical priors such as basis-sets, imperfection factors. However, when the signal-to-noise ratio of MRS signal is low, the solution may have large deviation. Methods: Linear Least Squares (LLS) is integrated with deep learning to reduce the complexity of solving this overall quantification. First, a neural network is designed to explicitly predict the imperfection factors and the overall signal from macromolecules. Then, metabolite quantification is solved analytically with the introduced LLS. In our Quantification Network (QNet), LLS takes part in the backpropagation of network training, which allows the feedback of the quantification error into metabolite spectrum estimation. This scheme greatly improves the generalization to metabolite concentrations unseen for training compared to the end-to-end deep learning method. Results: Experiments show that compared with LCModel, the proposed QNet, has smaller quantification errors for simulated data, and presents more stable quantification for 20 healthy in vivo data at a wide range of signal-to-noise ratio. QNet also outperforms other end-to-end deep learning methods. Conclusion: This study provides an intelligent, reliable and robust MRS quantification. Significance: QNet is the first LLS quantification aided by deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2023.

Builds on

6 of 52 references.

References · 6

  1. 2022Physics-driven Synthetic Data Learning for Biomedical Magnetic Resonancecited by 21
  2. 2020Review and Prospect: Deep Learning in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopycited by 17
  3. 2019Accelerated Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy with Deep Learningcited by 16
  4. 2020A Sparse Model-inspired Deep Thresholding Network for Exponential Signal Reconstruction -- Application in Fast Biological Spectroscopycited by 12
  5. 2018Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Quantification using Deep Learningcited by 8
  6. 2020Exponential Signal Reconstruction with Deep Hankel Matrix Factorizationcited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.