mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FRIGATE: Frugal Spatio-temporal Forecasting on Road Networks

arXiv 2306.08277 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Modelling spatio-temporal processes on road networks is a task of growing importance. While significant progress has been made on developing spatio-temporal graph neural networks (Gnns), existing works are built upon three assumptions that are not practical on real-world road networks. First, they assume sensing on every node of a road network. In reality, due to budget-constraints or sensor failures, all locations (nodes) may not be equipped with sensors. Second, they assume that sensing history is available at all installed sensors. This is unrealistic as well due to sensor failures, loss of packets during communication, etc. Finally, there is an assumption of static road networks. Connectivity within networks change due to road closures, constructions of new roads, etc. In this work, we develop FRIGATE to address all these shortcomings. FRIGATE is powered by a spatio-temporal Gnn that integrates positional, topological, and temporal information into rich inductive node representations. The joint fusion of this diverse information is made feasible through a novel combination of gated Lipschitz embeddings with Lstms. We prove that the proposed Gnn architecture is provably more expressive than message-passing Gnns used in state-of-the-art algorithms. The higher expressivity of FRIGATE naturally translates to superior empirical performance conducted on real-world network-constrained traffic data. In addition, FRIGATE is robust to frugal sensor deployment, changes in road network connectivity, and temporal irregularity in sensing.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  4. 2017Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks: A Deep Learning Framework for Traffic Forecastingcited by 1,136
  5. 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 829
  6. 2020Connecting the Dots: Multivariate Time Series Forecasting with Graph Neural Networkscited by 566
  7. 2020Adaptive Graph Convolutional Recurrent Network for Traffic Forecastingcited by 530
  8. 2019GMAN: A Graph Multi-Attention Network for Traffic Predictioncited by 434
  9. 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 263
  10. 2020Spatial-Temporal Fusion Graph Neural Networks for Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 213
  11. 2021Spatial-Temporal Graph ODE Networks for Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 210
  12. 2019Position-aware Graph Neural Networkscited by 203
8 more
  1. 2021Z-GCNETs: Time Zigzags at Graph Convolutional Networks for Time Series Forecastingcited by 67
  2. 2020GraphReach: Position-Aware Graph Neural Network using Reachability Estimationscited by 14
  3. 2021Space Meets Time: Local Spacetime Neural Network For Traffic Flow Forecastingcited by 7
  4. 2020Batching and Matching for Food Delivery in Dynamic Road Networkscited by 3
  5. 2022Few-Sample Traffic Prediction with Graph Networks using Locale as Relational Inductive Biasescited by 3
  6. 2015Trajectory Aware Macro-cell Planning for Mobile Userscited by 1
  7. 2017NetClus: A Scalable Framework for Locating Top-K Sites for Placement of Trajectory-Aware Servicescited by 1
  8. 2022Towards Learning in Grey Spatiotemporal Systems: A Prophet to Non-consecutive Spatiotemporal Dynamicscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 8; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort: