Assessing the Effectiveness of GPT-3 in Detecting False Political Statements: A Case Study on the LIAR Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The detection of political fake statements is crucial for maintaining information integrity and preventing the spread of misinformation in society. Historically, state-of-the-art machine learning models employed various methods for detecting deceptive statements. These methods include the use of metadata (W. Wang et al., 2018), n-grams analysis (Singh et al., 2021), and linguistic (Wu et al., 2022) and stylometric (Islam et al., 2020) features. Recent advancements in large language models, such as GPT-3 (Brown et al., 2020) have achieved state-of-the-art performance on a wide range of tasks. In this study, we conducted experiments with GPT-3 on the LIAR dataset (W. Wang et al., 2018) and achieved higher accuracy than state-of-the-art models without using any additional meta or linguistic features. Additionally, we experimented with zero-shot learning using a carefully designed prompt and achieved near state-of-the-art performance. An advantage of this approach is that the model provided evidence for its decision, which adds transparency to the model's decision-making and offers a chance for users to verify the validity of the evidence provided.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2023.
Builds on
6 of 14 references.
References · 6
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
- 2018FakeNewsNet: A Data Repository with News Content, Social Context and Spatialtemporal Information for Studying Fake News on Social Mediacited by 281
- 2017Automatic Detection of Fake Newscited by 145
- 2018Sampling the News Producers: A Large News and Feature Data Set for the Study of the Complex Media Landscapecited by 20
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 173
- 2024Generative Large Language Models in Automated Fact-Checking: A Surveycited by 19
- 2025Firm or Fickle? Evaluating Large Language Models Consistency in Sequential Interactionscited by 12
- 2024CommunityKG-RAG: Leveraging Community Structures in Knowledge Graphs for Advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Fact-Checkingcited by 11
- 2025Veri-R1: Toward Precise and Faithful Claim Verification via Online Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
- 2024MMIDR: Teaching Large Language Model to Interpret Multimodal Misinformation via Knowledge Distillationcited by 3
- 2024Identifying the sources of ideological bias in GPT models through linguistic variation in outputcited by 1
- 2025Veri-R1: Toward Precise and Faithful Claim Verification via Online Reinforcement Learning2 Oct 2025
- 2025Firm or Fickle? Evaluating Large Language Models Consistency in Sequential Interactions28 Mar 2025
- 2024Identifying the sources of ideological bias in GPT models through linguistic variation in output9 Sep 2024
- 2024CommunityKG-RAG: Leveraging Community Structures in Knowledge Graphs for Advanced Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Fact-Checking16 Aug 2024
- 2024Generative Large Language Models in Automated Fact-Checking: A Survey2 Jul 2024
- 2024MMIDR: Teaching Large Language Model to Interpret Multimodal Misinformation via Knowledge Distillation21 Mar 2024
- 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?25 Sep 2023