mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Knowledge-Prompted Estimator: A Novel Approach to Explainable Machine Translation Assessment

arXiv 2306.07486 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2023cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Cross-lingual Machine Translation (MT) quality estimation plays a crucial role in evaluating translation performance. GEMBA, the first MT quality assessment metric based on Large Language Models (LLMs), employs one-step prompting to achieve state-of-the-art (SOTA) in system-level MT quality estimation; however, it lacks segment-level analysis. In contrast, Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting outperforms one-step prompting by offering improved reasoning and explainability. In this paper, we introduce Knowledge-Prompted Estimator (KPE), a CoT prompting method that combines three one-step prompting techniques, including perplexity, token-level similarity, and sentence-level similarity. This method attains enhanced performance for segment-level estimation compared with previous deep learning models and one-step prompting approaches. Furthermore, supplementary experiments on word-level visualized alignment demonstrate that our KPE method significantly improves token alignment compared with earlier models and provides better interpretability for MT quality estimation. Code will be released upon publication.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2023.

Builds on

15 of 26 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2022Automatic Chain of Thought Prompting in Large Language Modelscited by 684
  4. 2019How multilingual is Multilingual BERT?cited by 642
  5. 2018Massively Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer and Beyondcited by 434
  6. 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
  7. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  8. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 387
  9. 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 344
  10. 2019Multilingual Universal Sentence Encoder for Semantic Retrievalcited by 192
  11. 2023Is ChatGPT A Good Translator? Yes With GPT-4 As The Enginecited by 172
  12. 2021To Ship or Not to Ship: An Extensive Evaluation of Automatic Metrics for Machine Translationcited by 161
3 more
  1. 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
  2. 2020On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 36
  3. 2023ChatGPT, Large Language Technologies, and the Bumpy Road of Benefiting Humanitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Error Analysis Prompting Enables Human-Like Translation Evaluation in Large Language Models
  2. 2024What do Large Language Models Need for Machine Translation Evaluation?
  3. 2025LLMs Are Not Scorers: Rethinking MT Evaluation with Generation-Based Methods
  4. 2025BatchGEMBA: Token-Efficient Machine Translation Evaluation with Batched Prompting and Prompt Compression
  5. 2025TransEvalnia: Reasoning-based Evaluation and Ranking of Translations
  6. 2024PromptOptMe: Error-Aware Prompt Compression for LLM-based MT Evaluation Metrics
  7. 2025Compensating for Data with Reasoning: Low-Resource Machine Translation with LLMs
  8. 2024Refining Translations with LLMs: A Constraint-Aware Iterative Prompting Approach