mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Protocol for Continual Explanation of SHAP

arXiv 2306.07218 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Continual Learning trains models on a stream of data, with the aim of learning new information without forgetting previous knowledge. Given the dynamic nature of such environments, explaining the predictions of these models can be challenging. We study the behavior of SHAP values explanations in Continual Learning and propose an evaluation protocol to robustly assess the change of explanations in Class-Incremental scenarios. We observed that, while Replay strategies enforce the stability of SHAP values in feedforward/convolutional models, they are not able to do the same with fully-trained recurrent models. We show that alternative recurrent approaches, like randomized recurrent models, are more effective in keeping the explanations stable over time.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 8 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

8 of 8 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  3. 2019Gradient based sample selection for online continual learningcited by 571
  4. 2020Remembering for the Right Reasons: Explanations Reduce Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 34
  5. 2021Continual Learning for Recurrent Neural Networks: an Empirical Evaluationcited by 34
  6. 2023Avalanche: A PyTorch Library for Deep Continual Learningcited by 33
  7. 2023ICICLE: Interpretable Class Incremental Continual Learningcited by 24
  8. 2021Continual Learning with Echo State Networkscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.