mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Making Binary Classification from Multiple Unlabeled Datasets Almost Free of Supervision

arXiv 2306.07036 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training a classifier exploiting a huge amount of supervised data is expensive or even prohibited in a situation, where the labeling cost is high. The remarkable progress in working with weaker forms of supervision is binary classification from multiple unlabeled datasets which requires the knowledge of exact class priors for all unlabeled datasets. However, the availability of class priors is restrictive in many real-world scenarios. To address this issue, we propose to solve a new problem setting, i.e., binary classification from multiple unlabeled datasets with only one pairwise numerical relationship of class priors (MU-OPPO), which knows the relative order (which unlabeled dataset has a higher proportion of positive examples) of two class-prior probabilities for two datasets among multiple unlabeled datasets. In MU-OPPO, we do not need the class priors for all unlabeled datasets, but we only require that there exists a pair of unlabeled datasets for which we know which unlabeled dataset has a larger class prior. Clearly, this form of supervision is easier to be obtained, which can make labeling costs almost free. We propose a novel framework to handle the MU-OPPO problem, which consists of four sequential modules: (i) pseudo label assignment; (ii) confident example collection; (iii) class prior estimation; (iv) classifier training with estimated class priors. Theoretically, we analyze the gap between estimated class priors and true class priors under the proposed framework. Empirically, we confirm the superiority of our framework with comprehensive experiments. Experimental results demonstrate that our framework brings smaller estimation errors of class priors and better performance of binary classification.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2023.

Builds on

42 of 80 references.

References · 42

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2018Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labelscited by 1,053
  5. 2017A Closer Look at Memorization in Deep Networkscited by 936
  6. 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 663
  7. 2017MentorNet: Learning Data-Driven Curriculum for Very Deep Neural Networks on Corrupted Labelscited by 652
  8. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  9. 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
  10. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  11. 2019Unsupervised Label Noise Modeling and Loss Correctioncited by 327
  12. 2020Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularizationcited by 289
30 more
  1. 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 259
  2. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  3. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  4. 2021Be Confident! Towards Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks via Confidence Calibrationcited by 91
  5. 2021FINE Samples for Learning with Noisy Labelscited by 82
  6. 2013Classification with Asymmetric Label Noise: Consistency and Maximal Denoisingcited by 67
  7. 2016Mixture Proportion Estimation via Kernel Embedding of Distributionscited by 67
  8. 2019Robust Inference via Generative Classifiers for Handling Noisy Labelscited by 67
  9. 2020Learning from Rules Generalizing Labeled Exemplarscited by 59
  10. 2019On Symmetric Losses for Learning from Corrupted Labelscited by 53
  11. 2017Learning with Confident Examples: Rank Pruning for Robust Classification with Noisy Labelscited by 52
  12. 2020Interactive Weak Supervision: Learning Useful Heuristics for Data Labelingcited by 52
  13. 2021Mixture Proportion Estimation and PU Learning: A Modern Approachcited by 52
  14. 2017Learning the Structure of Generative Models without Labeled Datacited by 50
  15. 2018On the Minimal Supervision for Training Any Binary Classifier from Only Unlabeled Datacited by 43
  16. 2019How does Early Stopping Help Generalization against Label Noise?cited by 41
  17. 2022Mitigating Memorization of Noisy Labels by Clipping the Model Predictioncited by 40
  18. 2014On Learning from Label Proportionscited by 38
  19. 2020Improving Generalization by Controlling Label-Noise Information in Neural Network Weightscited by 35
  20. 2019Learning from Label Proportions with Consistency Regularizationcited by 34
  21. 2021End-to-End Weak Supervisioncited by 33
  22. 2019Learning Dependency Structures for Weak Supervision Modelscited by 32
  23. 2019Mitigating Overfitting in Supervised Classification from Two Unlabeled Datasets: A Consistent Risk Correction Approachcited by 29
  24. 2020A One-step Approach to Covariate Shift Adaptationcited by 20
  25. 2021Objects in Semantic Topologycited by 18
  26. 2020Rethinking Class-Prior Estimation for Positive-Unlabeled Learningcited by 15
  27. 2021An Instance-Dependent Simulation Framework for Learning with Label Noisecited by 14
  28. 2016Nonparametric semi-supervised learning of class proportionscited by 13
  29. 2021Binary Classification from Multiple Unlabeled Datasets via Surrogate Set Classificationcited by 12
  30. 2013Clustering Unclustered Data: Unsupervised Binary Labeling of Two Datasets Having Different Class Balancescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.