A Cover Time Study of a non-Markovian Algorithm
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given a traversal algorithm, cover time is the expected number of steps needed to visit all nodes in a given graph. A smaller cover time means a higher exploration efficiency of traversal algorithm. Although random walk algorithms have been studied extensively in the existing literature, there has been no cover time result for any non-Markovian method. In this work, we stand on a theoretical perspective and show that the negative feedback strategy (a count-based exploration method) is better than the naive random walk search. In particular, the former strategy can locally improve the search efficiency for an arbitrary graph. It also achieves smaller cover times for special but important graphs, including clique graphs, tree graphs, etc. Moreover, we make connections between our results and reinforcement learning literature to give new insights on why classical UCB and MCTS algorithms are so useful. Various numerical results corroborate our theoretical findings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Jun 2023.
Builds on
13 of 65 references.
References · 13
- 2017Curiosity-driven Exploration by Self-supervised Predictioncited by 1,194
- 2016Unifying Count-Based Exploration and Intrinsic Motivationcited by 639
- 2018Large-Scale Study of Curiosity-Driven Learningcited by 280
- 2018Provably Efficient Maximum Entropy Explorationcited by 242
- 2013(More) Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Posterior Samplingcited by 233
- 2017Deep Exploration via Randomized Value Functionscited by 156
- 2017A Laplacian Framework for Option Discovery in Reinforcement Learningcited by 110
- 2017Eigenoption Discovery through the Deep Successor Representationcited by 86
- 2021A Survey of Exploration Methods in Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
- 2018Diversity-Driven Exploration Strategy for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 65
- 2019Discovering Options for Exploration by Minimizing Cover Timecited by 31
- 2020Improved Analysis of UCRL2 with Empirical Bernstein Inequalitycited by 18
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.