mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transferable Adversarial Robustness for Categorical Data via Universal Robust Embeddings

arXiv 2306.04064 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Research on adversarial robustness is primarily focused on image and text data. Yet, many scenarios in which lack of robustness can result in serious risks, such as fraud detection, medical diagnosis, or recommender systems often do not rely on images or text but instead on tabular data. Adversarial robustness in tabular data poses two serious challenges. First, tabular datasets often contain categorical features, and therefore cannot be tackled directly with existing optimization procedures. Second, in the tabular domain, algorithms that are not based on deep networks are widely used and offer great performance, but algorithms to enhance robustness are tailored to neural networks (e.g. adversarial training). In this paper, we tackle both challenges. We present a method that allows us to train adversarially robust deep networks for tabular data and to transfer this robustness to other classifiers via universal robust embeddings tailored to categorical data. These embeddings, created using a bilevel alternating minimization framework, can be transferred to boosted trees or random forests making them robust without the need for adversarial training while preserving their high accuracy on tabular data. We show that our methods outperform existing techniques within a practical threat model suitable for tabular data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.

Builds on

25 of 37 references.

References · 25

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  7. 2021Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Datacited by 725
  8. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  9. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 640
  10. 2018Approximation Methods for Bilevel Programmingcited by 231
  11. 2022Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?cited by 198
  12. 2019You Only Propagate Once: Accelerating Adversarial Training via Maximal Principlecited by 181
13 more
  1. 2021Towards Robustness Against Natural Language Word Substitutionscited by 68
  2. 2022"Real Attackers Don't Compute Gradients": Bridging the Gap Between Adversarial ML Research and Practicecited by 55
  3. 2015Evasion and Hardening of Tree Ensemble Classifierscited by 44
  4. 2019Robust Decision Trees Against Adversarial Examplescited by 40
  5. 2022Turning the Tables: Biased, Imbalanced, Dynamic Tabular Datasets for ML Evaluationcited by 39
  6. 2022Click-Through Rate Prediction in Online Advertising: A Literature Reviewcited by 31
  7. 2019Provably Robust Boosted Decision Stumps and Trees against Adversarial Attackscited by 26
  8. 2022Machine Learning Security in Industry: A Quantitative Surveycited by 21
  9. 2022Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Data through Cost and Utility Awarenesscited by 14
  10. 2022Robust Textual Embedding against Word-level Adversarial Attackscited by 12
  11. 2019Synthesizing Credit Card Transactionscited by 10
  12. 2018Cost-Sensitive Robustness against Adversarial Examplescited by 9
  13. 2021Adversarial Learning with Cost-Sensitive Classescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.