mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Designing explainable artificial intelligence with active inference: A framework for transparent introspection and decision-making

arXiv 2306.04025 ↗First posted 6 Jun 2023cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates the prospect of developing human-interpretable, explainable artificial intelligence (AI) systems based on active inference and the free energy principle. We first provide a brief overview of active inference, and in particular, of how it applies to the modeling of decision-making, introspection, as well as the generation of overt and covert actions. We then discuss how active inference can be leveraged to design explainable AI systems, namely, by allowing us to model core features of ``introspective'' processes and by generating useful, human-interpretable models of the processes involved in decision-making. We propose an architecture for explainable AI systems using active inference. This architecture foregrounds the role of an explicit hierarchical generative model, the operation of which enables the AI system to track and explain the factors that contribute to its own decisions, and whose structure is designed to be interpretable and auditable by human users. We outline how this architecture can integrate diverse sources of information to make informed decisions in an auditable manner, mimicking or reproducing aspects of human-like consciousness and introspection. Finally, we discuss the implications of our findings for future research in AI, and the potential ethical considerations of developing AI systems with (the appearance of) introspective capabilities.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2023.

Builds on

22 of 104 references.

References · 22

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2017Interpretable Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 161
  6. 2020Interpretability of machine learning based prediction models in healthcarecited by 75
  7. 2022The Forgotten Margins of AI Ethicscited by 30
  8. 2022Designing Ecosystems of Intelligence from First Principlescited by 23
  9. 2022Introspective Learning : A Two-Stage Approach for Inference in Neural Networkscited by 19
  10. 2019Deep Learning Models for Global Coordinate Transformations that Linearize PDEscited by 17
  11. 2022A Transparency Index Framework for AI in Educationcited by 13
  12. 2023Comparing Software Developers with ChatGPT: An Empirical Investigationcited by 11
10 more
  1. 2021Bayesian Mechanics for Stationary Processescited by 10
  2. 2021The human-AI relationship in decision-making: AI explanation to support people on justifying their decisionscited by 9
  3. 2023AI Reliance and Decision Quality: Fundamentals, Interdependence, and the Effects of Interventionscited by 8
  4. 2019Awareness as inference in a higher-order state spacecited by 7
  5. 2020Which Kind Is Better in Open-domain Multi-turn Dialog,Hierarchical or Non-hierarchical Models? An Empirical Studycited by 3
  6. 2020Soft Attention Convolutional Neural Networks for Rare Event Detection in Sequencescited by 2
  7. 2023Rejecting Cognitivism: Computational Phenomenology for Deep Learningcited by 2
  8. 2022Efficient Interdependent Systems Recovery Modeling with DeepONetscited by 1
  9. 2023Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Subverting Gender Norms in Robot-Human Interactioncited by 1
  10. 2023The inner screen model of consciousness: applying the free energy principle directly to the study of conscious experiencecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.