mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explaining and Adapting Graph Conditional Shift

arXiv 2306.03256 ↗First posted 5 Jun 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown remarkable performance on graph-structured data. However, recent empirical studies suggest that GNNs are very susceptible to distribution shift. There is still significant ambiguity about why graph-based models seem more vulnerable to these shifts. In this work we provide a thorough theoretical analysis on it by quantifying the magnitude of conditional shift between the input features and the output label. Our findings show that both graph heterophily and model architecture exacerbate conditional shifts, leading to performance degradation. To address this, we propose an approach that involves estimating and minimizing the conditional shift for unsupervised domain adaptation on graphs. In our controlled synthetic experiments, our algorithm demonstrates robustness towards distribution shift, resulting in up to 10% absolute ROC AUC improvement versus the second-best algorithm. Furthermore, comprehensive experiments on both node classification and graph classification show its robust performance under various distribution shifts.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2023.

Builds on

28 of 50 references.

References · 28

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
  5. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,023
  6. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  7. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  8. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  9. 2015Learning Transferable Features with Deep Adaptation Networkscited by 1,323
  10. 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
  11. 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
  12. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 280
16 more
  1. 2017Central Moment Discrepancy (CMD) for Domain-Invariant Representation Learningcited by 192
  2. 2021Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?cited by 182
  3. 2022Handling Distribution Shifts on Graphs: An Invariance Perspectivecited by 163
  4. 2020Machine Learning on Graphs: A Model and Comprehensive Taxonomycited by 156
  5. 2022GOOD: A Graph Out-of-Distribution Benchmarkcited by 140
  6. 2018Contextual Stochastic Block Modelscited by 134
  7. 2020From Local Structures to Size Generalization in Graph Neural Networkscited by 119
  8. 2021Do Neural Optimal Transport Solvers Work? A Continuous Wasserstein-2 Benchmarkcited by 95
  9. 2020Transfer Learning of Graph Neural Networks with Ego-graph Information Maximizationcited by 93
  10. 2021Shift-Robust GNNs: Overcoming the Limitations of Localized Graph Training Datacited by 86
  11. 2021Size-Invariant Graph Representations for Graph Classification Extrapolationscited by 82
  12. 2021Graph Convolution for Semi-Supervised Classification: Improved Linear Separability and Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 70
  13. 2021Subgroup Generalization and Fairness of Graph Neural Networkscited by 69
  14. 2019DANE: Domain Adaptive Network Embeddingcited by 43
  15. 2022Tree Mover's Distance: Bridging Graph Metrics and Stability of Graph Neural Networkscited by 39
  16. 2021Graph Domain Adaptation: A Generative Viewcited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 9; 2025: 3.

14 papers.

Sort: