mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adaptive Attractors: A Defense Strategy against ML Adversarial Collusion Attacks

arXiv 2306.01400 ↗First posted 2 Jun 2023cs.LG cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the seller-buyer setting on machine learning models, the seller generates different copies based on the original model and distributes them to different buyers, such that adversarial samples generated on one buyer's copy would likely not work on other copies. A known approach achieves this using attractor-based rewriter which injects different attractors to different copies. This induces different adversarial regions in different copies, making adversarial samples generated on one copy not replicable on others. In this paper, we focus on a scenario where multiple malicious buyers collude to attack. We first give two formulations and conduct empirical studies to analyze effectiveness of collusion attack under different assumptions on the attacker's capabilities and properties of the attractors. We observe that existing attractor-based methods do not effectively mislead the colluders in the sense that adversarial samples found are influenced more by the original model instead of the attractors as number of colluders increases. Based on this observation, we propose using adaptive attractors whose weight is guided by a U-shape curve to cover the shortfalls. Experimentation results show that when using our approach, the attack success rate of a collusion attack converges to around 15% even when lots of copies are applied for collusion. In contrast, when using the existing attractor-based rewriter with fixed weight, the attack success rate increases linearly with the number of copies used for collusion.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2023.

Builds on

17 of 25 references.

References · 17

  1. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  6. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  7. 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
  8. 2019HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based Attackcited by 328
  9. 2017Parseval Networks: Improving Robustness to Adversarial Examplescited by 288
  10. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
  11. 2020GeoDA: a geometric framework for black-box adversarial attackscited by 66
  12. 2017Adversarial and Clean Data Are Not Twinscited by 52
5 more
  1. 2015Understanding Adversarial Training: Increasing Local Stability of Neural Nets through Robust Optimizationcited by 32
  2. 2021Attacking Adversarial Attacks as A Defensecited by 31
  3. 2018Resisting Adversarial Attacks using Gaussian Mixture Variational Autoencoderscited by 26
  4. 2022Adversarial Attack on Attackers: Post-Process to Mitigate Black-Box Score-Based Query Attackscited by 18
  5. 2022Tracing the Origin of Adversarial Attack for Forensic Investigation and Deterrencecited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.