Combining Explicit and Implicit Regularization for Efficient Learning in Deep Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Works on implicit regularization have studied gradient trajectories during the optimization process to explain why deep networks favor certain kinds of solutions over others. In deep linear networks, it has been shown that gradient descent implicitly regularizes toward low-rank solutions on matrix completion/factorization tasks. Adding depth not only improves performance on these tasks but also acts as an accelerative pre-conditioning that further enhances this bias towards low-rankedness. Inspired by this, we propose an explicit penalty to mirror this implicit bias which only takes effect with certain adaptive gradient optimizers (e.g. Adam). This combination can enable a degenerate single-layer network to achieve low-rank approximations with generalization error comparable to deep linear networks, making depth no longer necessary for learning. The single-layer network also performs competitively or out-performs various approaches for matrix completion over a range of parameter and data regimes despite its simplicity. Together with an optimizer's inductive bias, our findings suggest that explicit regularization can play a role in designing different, desirable forms of regularization and that a more nuanced understanding of this interplay may be necessary.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 74 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2023.
Builds on
41 of 74 references.
References · 41
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,722
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2016On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minimacited by 1,337
- 2019On the Variance of the Adaptive Learning Rate and Beyondcited by 763
- 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
- 2019Benign Overfitting in Linear Regressioncited by 544
- 2019Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find Themcited by 507
- 2017Sharp Minima Can Generalize For Deep Netscited by 462
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 402
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Matrix Factorizationcited by 318
- 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
29 more
- 2018On the Optimization of Deep Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Overparameterizationcited by 280
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
- 2017Neural Factorization Machines for Sparse Predictive Analyticscited by 183
- 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 159
- 2020Implicit Gradient Regularizationcited by 145
- 2017Dissecting Adam: The Sign, Magnitude and Variance of Stochastic Gradientscited by 136
- 2022Understanding Gradient Descent on Edge of Stability in Deep Learningcited by 126
- 2019Which Algorithmic Choices Matter at Which Batch Sizes? Insights From a Noisy Quadratic Modelcited by 116
- 2016Identity Matters in Deep Learningcited by 107
- 2018Does data interpolation contradict statistical optimality?cited by 95
- 2017Geometric Matrix Completion with Recurrent Multi-Graph Neural Networkscited by 88
- 2022Adaptive Gradient Methods at the Edge of Stabilitycited by 88
- 2021On the Implicit Bias of Initialization Shape: Beyond Infinitesimal Mirror Descentcited by 69
- 2019ME-Net: Towards Effective Adversarial Robustness with Matrix Estimationcited by 65
- 2017Implicit Regularization in Nonconvex Statistical Estimation: Gradient Descent Converges Linearly for Phase Retrieval, Matrix Completion, and Blind Deconvolutioncited by 63
- 2019Learning deep linear neural networks: Riemannian gradient flows and convergence to global minimizerscited by 61
- 2022Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Reparametrized Models: On Equivalence to Mirror Descentcited by 38
- 2017Second-Order Optimization for Non-Convex Machine Learning: An Empirical Studycited by 35
- 2013Provable Inductive Matrix Completioncited by 31
- 2020When Does Preconditioning Help or Hurt Generalization?cited by 30
- 2014Matrix Completion on Graphscited by 26
- 2020Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Low-Rank Matrix Estimationcited by 25
- 2018Online Embedding Compression for Text Classification using Low Rank Matrix Factorizationcited by 22
- 2017AutoSVD++: An Efficient Hybrid Collaborative Filtering Model via Contractive Auto-encoderscited by 20
- 2021Implicit Regularization in Matrix Sensing via Mirror Descentcited by 11
- 2019Geometry, Computation, and Optimality in Stochastic Optimizationcited by 9
- 2015Why are deep nets reversible: A simple theory, with implications for trainingcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024Pretraining with Random Noise for Fast and Robust Learning without Weight Transportcited by 5
- 2026NuMuon: Nuclear-Norm-Constrained Muon for Compressible LLM Trainingcited by 4
- 2023Efficient Compression of Overparameterized Deep Models through Low-Dimensional Learning Dynamicscited by 3
- 2025Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with Normalizationcited by 0
- 2026NuMuon: Nuclear-Norm-Constrained Muon for Compressible LLM Training4 Mar 2026
- 2025Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with Normalization26 May 2025
- 2024Pretraining with Random Noise for Fast and Robust Learning without Weight Transport27 May 2024
- 2023Efficient Compression of Overparameterized Deep Models through Low-Dimensional Learning Dynamics8 Nov 2023