Investigating the Effects of Fairness Interventions Using Pointwise Representational Similarity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) algorithms can often exhibit discriminatory behavior, negatively affecting certain populations across protected groups. To address this, numerous debiasing methods, and consequently evaluation measures, have been proposed. Current evaluation measures for debiasing methods suffer from two main limitations: (1) they primarily provide a global estimate of unfairness, failing to provide a more fine-grained analysis, and (2) they predominantly analyze the model output on a specific task, failing to generalize the findings to other tasks. In this work, we introduce Pointwise Normalized Kernel Alignment (PNKA), a pointwise representational similarity measure that addresses these limitations by measuring how debiasing measures affect the intermediate representations of individuals. On tabular data, the use of PNKA reveals previously unknown insights: while group fairness predominantly influences a small subset of the population, maintaining high representational similarity for the majority, individual fairness constraints uniformly impact representations across the entire population, altering nearly every data point. We show that by evaluating representations using PNKA, we can reliably predict the behavior of ML models trained on these representations. Moreover, applying PNKA to language embeddings shows that existing debiasing methods may not perform as intended, failing to remove biases from stereotypical words and sentences. Our findings suggest that current evaluation measures for debiasing methods are insufficient, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of the effects of debiasing methods, and show how pointwise representational similarity metrics can help with fairness audits.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 64 of its 97 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2023.
Builds on
64 of 97 references.
References · 64
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2019BERT4Rec: Sequential Recommendation with Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformercited by 952
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
38 more
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
- 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 493
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
- 2019On Measuring Social Biases in Sentence Encoderscited by 397
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
- 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2018Insights on representational similarity in neural networks with canonical correlationcited by 318
- 2019Measuring Bias in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 275
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2019Towards Fairness in Visual Recognition: Effective Strategies for Bias Mitigationcited by 252
- 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 251
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 241
- 2018Generalisation in humans and deep neural networkscited by 237
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2015Convergent Learning: Do different neural networks learn the same representations?cited by 215
- 2018Gender Bias in Neural Natural Language Processingcited by 210
- 2019Gender Bias in Contextualized Word Embeddingscited by 203
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2022Relative representations enable zero-shot latent space communicationcited by 175
- 2018Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddingscited by 169
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
- 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
- 2020Anatomy of Catastrophic Forgetting: Hidden Representations and Task Semanticscited by 158
- 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
- 2019Mitigate Bias in Face Recognition using Skewness-Aware Reinforcement Learningcited by 145
- 2019Assessing Social and Intersectional Biases in Contextualized Word Representationscited by 134
- 2021Debiasing Pre-trained Contextualised Embeddingscited by 107
- 2021An Empirical Survey of the Effectiveness of Debiasing Techniques for Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 96
50 most cited of 64 All 64 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.