mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Generalized Autoregressive Score Trees and Forests

arXiv 2305.18991 ↗First posted 30 May 2023econ.EM q-fin.RM stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose methods to improve the forecasts from generalized autoregressive score (GAS) models (Creal et. al, 2013; Harvey, 2013) by localizing their parameters using decision trees and random forests. These methods avoid the curse of dimensionality faced by kernel-based approaches, and allow one to draw on information from multiple state variables simultaneously. We apply the new models to four distinct empirical analyses, and in all applications the proposed new methods significantly outperform the baseline GAS model. In our applications to stock return volatility and density prediction, the optimal GAS tree model reveals a leverage effect and a variance risk premium effect. Our study of stock-bond dependence finds evidence of a flight-to-quality effect in the optimal GAS forest forecasts, while our analysis of high-frequency trade durations uncovers a volume-volatility effect.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 May 2023.

Builds on

9 of 68 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
  2. 2019Machine Learning Methods Economists Should Know Aboutcited by 64
  3. 2018Distributional Regression Forests for Probabilistic Precipitation Forecasting in Complex Terraincited by 19
  4. 2020How is Machine Learning Useful for Macroeconomic Forecasting?cited by 18
  5. 2020The Macroeconomy as a Random Forestcited by 15
  6. 2020Nowcasting in a Pandemic using Non-Parametric Mixed Frequency VARscited by 11
  7. 2019A Statistical Recurrent Stochastic Volatility Model for Stock Marketscited by 7
  8. 2020Recurrent Conditional Heteroskedasticitycited by 5
  9. 2022HARNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Realized Volatility Forecastingcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.