Safety of autonomous vehicles: A survey on Model-based vs. AI-based approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The growing advancements in Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) have emphasized the critical need to prioritize the absolute safety of AV maneuvers, especially in dynamic and unpredictable environments or situations. This objective becomes even more challenging due to the uniqueness of every traffic situation/condition. To cope with all these very constrained and complex configurations, AVs must have appropriate control architectures with reliable and real-time Risk Assessment and Management Strategies (RAMS). These targeted RAMS must lead to reduce drastically the navigation risks. However, the lack of safety guarantees proves, which is one of the key challenges to be addressed, limit drastically the ambition to introduce more broadly AVs on our roads and restrict the use of AVs to very limited use cases. Therefore, the focus and the ambition of this paper is to survey research on autonomous vehicles while focusing on the important topic of safety guarantee of AVs. For this purpose, it is proposed to review research on relevant methods and concepts defining an overall control architecture for AVs, with an emphasis on the safety assessment and decision-making systems composing these architectures. Moreover, it is intended through this reviewing process to highlight researches that use either model-based methods or AI-based approaches. This is performed while emphasizing the strengths and weaknesses of each methodology and investigating the research that proposes a comprehensive multi-modal design that combines model-based and AI approaches. This paper ends with discussions on the methods used to guarantee the safety of AVs namely: safety verification techniques and the standardization/generalization of safety frameworks.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2023.
Builds on
17 of 87 references.
References · 17
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,614
- 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,002
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 699
- 2017A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 466
- 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Techniques for Autonomous Drivingcited by 402
- 2018ChauffeurNet: Learning to Drive by Imitating the Best and Synthesizing the Worstcited by 393
- 2016A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-driving Urban Vehiclescited by 253
- 2017On a Formal Model of Safe and Scalable Self-driving Carscited by 131
- 2019A Survey of Deep Learning Applications to Autonomous Vehicle Controlcited by 102
- 2020Deep Reinforcement Learning for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 94
- 2017Virtual to Real Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 79
- 2017Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Carcited by 66
5 more
- 2016Towards Verified Artificial Intelligencecited by 36
- 2020A Survey on Autonomous Vehicle Control in the Era of Mixed-Autonomy: From Physics-Based to AI-Guided Driving Policy Learningcited by 24
- 2018Is it Safe to Drive? An Overview of Factors, Challenges, and Datasets for Driveability Assessment in Autonomous Drivingcited by 11
- 2016Debugging Machine Learning Taskscited by 10
- 2019A Systematic Literature Review about the impact of Artificial Intelligence on Autonomous Vehicle Safetycited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.