InDL: A New Dataset and Benchmark for In-Diagram Logic Interpretation based on Visual Illusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper introduces a novel approach to evaluating deep learning models' capacity for in-diagram logic interpretation. Leveraging the intriguing realm of visual illusions, we establish a unique dataset, InDL, designed to rigorously test and benchmark these models. Deep learning has witnessed remarkable progress in domains such as computer vision and natural language processing. However, models often stumble in tasks requiring logical reasoning due to their inherent 'black box' characteristics, which obscure the decision-making process. Our work presents a new lens to understand these models better by focusing on their handling of visual illusions -- a complex interplay of perception and logic. We utilize six classic geometric optical illusions to create a comparative framework between human and machine visual perception. This methodology offers a quantifiable measure to rank models, elucidating potential weaknesses and providing actionable insights for model improvements. Our experimental results affirm the efficacy of our benchmarking strategy, demonstrating its ability to effectively rank models based on their logic interpretation ability. As part of our commitment to reproducible research, the source code and datasets will be made publicly available at https://github.com/rabbit-magic-wh/InDL
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 May 2023.
Builds on
20 of 48 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
- 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
- 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,457
8 more
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2021EfficientNetV2: Smaller Models and Faster Trainingcited by 1,135
- 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,101
- 2021ResNet strikes back: An improved training procedure in timmcited by 368
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 196
- 2018Measuring abstract reasoning in neural networkscited by 166
- 2016Towards Deep Symbolic Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
- 2019Prediction of Dashed Caf'e Wall illusion by the Classical Receptive Field Modelcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023V-LoL: A Diagnostic Dataset for Visual Logical Learning
- 2026Can LVLMs Uncover the Truth Behind Visual Illusions? An Analysis of Perceptual and Reasoning Capabilities
- 2025Math Blind: Failures in Diagram Understanding Undermine Reasoning in MLLMs
- 2026Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating Grounded Visual Evidence in Thinking with Images
- 2025SemVink: Advancing VLMs' Semantic Understanding of Optical Illusions via Visual Global Thinking
- 2024IllusionVQA: A Challenging Optical Illusion Dataset for Vision Language Models
- 2026Thinking with Drafting: Optical Decompression via Logical Reconstruction
- 2026Seeing Is Believing? A Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models on Visual Illusions and Anomalies