mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

UNITE: A Unified Benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation

arXiv 2305.16265 ↗First posted 25 May 2023cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A practical text-to-SQL system should generalize well on a wide variety of natural language questions, unseen database schemas, and novel SQL query structures. To comprehensively evaluate text-to-SQL systems, we introduce a UNIfied benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation (UNITE). It is composed of publicly available text-to-SQL datasets, containing natural language questions from more than 12 domains, SQL queries from more than 3.9K patterns, and 29K databases. Compared to the widely used Spider benchmark, we introduce ~120K additional examples and a threefold increase in SQL patterns, such as comparative and boolean questions. We conduct a systematic study of six state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-SQL parsers on our new benchmark and show that: 1) Codex performs surprisingly well on out-of-domain datasets; 2) specially designed decoding methods (e.g. constrained beam search) can improve performance for both in-domain and out-of-domain settings; 3) explicitly modeling the relationship between questions and schemas further improves the Seq2Seq models. More importantly, our benchmark presents key challenges towards compositional generalization and robustness issues -- which these SOTA models cannot address well. Our code and data processing script are available at https://github.com/awslabs/unified-text2sql-benchmark

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.

Builds on

21 of 29 references.

References · 21

  1. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  2. 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
  3. 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
  4. 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
  5. 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 402
  6. 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 292
  7. 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 180
  8. 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
  9. 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 141
  10. 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
  11. 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
  12. 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
9 more
  1. 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 105
  2. 2022Evaluating the Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 101
  3. 2020SmBoP: Semi-autoregressive Bottom-up Semantic Parsingcited by 97
  4. 2021Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalizationcited by 92
  5. 2022RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQLcited by 85
  6. 2020On the Potential of Lexico-logical Alignments for Semantic Parsing to SQL Queriescited by 59
  7. 2021SeaD: End-to-end Text-to-SQL Generation with Schema-aware Denoisingcited by 27
  8. 2018An End-to-end Neural Natural Language Interface for Databasescited by 5
  9. 2018CL Scholar: The ACL Anthology Knowledge Graph Minercited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: