UNITE: A Unified Benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A practical text-to-SQL system should generalize well on a wide variety of natural language questions, unseen database schemas, and novel SQL query structures. To comprehensively evaluate text-to-SQL systems, we introduce a UNIfied benchmark for Text-to-SQL Evaluation (UNITE). It is composed of publicly available text-to-SQL datasets, containing natural language questions from more than 12 domains, SQL queries from more than 3.9K patterns, and 29K databases. Compared to the widely used Spider benchmark, we introduce ~120K additional examples and a threefold increase in SQL patterns, such as comparative and boolean questions. We conduct a systematic study of six state-of-the-art (SOTA) text-to-SQL parsers on our new benchmark and show that: 1) Codex performs surprisingly well on out-of-domain datasets; 2) specially designed decoding methods (e.g. constrained beam search) can improve performance for both in-domain and out-of-domain settings; 3) explicitly modeling the relationship between questions and schemas further improves the Seq2Seq models. More importantly, our benchmark presents key challenges towards compositional generalization and robustness issues -- which these SOTA models cannot address well. Our code and data processing script are available at https://github.com/awslabs/unified-text2sql-benchmark
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.
Builds on
21 of 29 references.
References · 21
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2018Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Taskcited by 1,120
- 2017Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learningcited by 679
- 2015Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tablescited by 509
- 2021PICARD: Parsing Incrementally for Constrained Auto-Regressive Decoding from Language Modelscited by 402
- 2022UL2: Unifying Language Learning Paradigmscited by 292
- 2019CoSQL: A Conversational Text-to-SQL Challenge Towards Cross-Domain Natural Language Interfaces to Databasescited by 180
- 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
- 2019SParC: Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing in Contextcited by 141
- 2018Improving Text-to-SQL Evaluation Methodologycited by 133
- 2020Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQLcited by 126
- 2021Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitutioncited by 110
9 more
- 2021KaggleDBQA: Realistic Evaluation of Text-to-SQL Parserscited by 105
- 2022Evaluating the Text-to-SQL Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 101
- 2020SmBoP: Semi-autoregressive Bottom-up Semantic Parsingcited by 97
- 2021Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalizationcited by 92
- 2022RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQLcited by 85
- 2020On the Potential of Lexico-logical Alignments for Semantic Parsing to SQL Queriescited by 59
- 2021SeaD: End-to-end Text-to-SQL Generation with Schema-aware Denoisingcited by 27
- 2018An End-to-end Neural Natural Language Interface for Databasescited by 5
- 2018CL Scholar: The ACL Anthology Knowledge Graph Minercited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 1.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 37
- 2023Selective Demonstrations for Cross-domain Text-to-SQLcited by 21
- 2023Semantic Decomposition of Question and SQL for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 13
- 2024A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Generative AI for Text-to-SQL: Benchmarks, Applications, Use Cases, and Challengescited by 9
- 2023Adapt and Decompose: Efficient Generalization of Text-to-SQL via Domain Adapted Least-To-Most Promptingcited by 8
- 2025LogicCat: A Chain-of-Thought Text-to-SQL Benchmark for Complex Reasoningcited by 7
- 2023Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT -- A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparisoncited by 6
- 2025SQaLe: A Large Text-to-SQL Corpus Grounded in Real Schemascited by 3
- 2025A Systematic Approach for Assessing Large Language Models' Test Case Generation Capabilitycited by 1
- 2025SQLSpace: A Representation Space for Text-to-SQL to Discover and Mitigate Robustness Gapscited by 1
- 2025LLMSQL: Upgrading WikiSQL for the LLM Era of Text-to-SQLcited by 0
- 2025Retrieval and Augmentation of Domain Knowledge for Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 0
- 2026BADGER: Bridging Agentic and Deterministic Evaluation for Generative Enterprise Reasoning1 Jun 2026
- 2025A Multi-agent Text2SQL Framework using Small Language Models and Execution Feedback21 Dec 2025
- 2025SQaLe: A Large Text-to-SQL Corpus Grounded in Real Schemas16 Dec 2025
- 2025SQLSpace: A Representation Space for Text-to-SQL to Discover and Mitigate Robustness Gaps31 Oct 2025
- 2025Retrieval and Augmentation of Domain Knowledge for Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing1 Oct 2025
- 2025LLMSQL: Upgrading WikiSQL for the LLM Era of Text-to-SQL27 Sep 2025
- 2025LogicCat: A Chain-of-Thought Text-to-SQL Benchmark for Complex Reasoning24 May 2025
- 2025A Systematic Approach for Assessing Large Language Models' Test Case Generation Capability5 Feb 2025
- 2024A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Generative AI for Text-to-SQL: Benchmarks, Applications, Use Cases, and Challenges6 Dec 2024
- 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQL3 Sep 2024
- 2023Semantic Decomposition of Question and SQL for Text-to-SQL Parsing20 Oct 2023
- 2023Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT -- A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparison16 Oct 2023
- 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQLcited by 37
- 2023Selective Demonstrations for Cross-domain Text-to-SQLcited by 21
- 2023Semantic Decomposition of Question and SQL for Text-to-SQL Parsingcited by 13
- 2024A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Generative AI for Text-to-SQL: Benchmarks, Applications, Use Cases, and Challengescited by 9
- 2023Adapt and Decompose: Efficient Generalization of Text-to-SQL via Domain Adapted Least-To-Most Promptingcited by 8
- 2023Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT -- A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparisoncited by 6
- 2025SQaLe: A Large Text-to-SQL Corpus Grounded in Real Schemascited by 3
- 2025A Systematic Approach for Assessing Large Language Models' Test Case Generation Capabilitycited by 1
- 2025SQLSpace: A Representation Space for Text-to-SQL to Discover and Mitigate Robustness Gapscited by 1
- 2025LLMSQL: Upgrading WikiSQL for the LLM Era of Text-to-SQLcited by 0
- 2025Retrieval and Augmentation of Domain Knowledge for Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsingcited by 0
- 2025SQaLe: A Large Text-to-SQL Corpus Grounded in Real Schemas16 Dec 2025
- 2025SQLSpace: A Representation Space for Text-to-SQL to Discover and Mitigate Robustness Gaps31 Oct 2025
- 2025Retrieval and Augmentation of Domain Knowledge for Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing1 Oct 2025
- 2025LLMSQL: Upgrading WikiSQL for the LLM Era of Text-to-SQL27 Sep 2025
- 2025A Systematic Approach for Assessing Large Language Models' Test Case Generation Capability5 Feb 2025
- 2024A Survey of Large Language Model-Based Generative AI for Text-to-SQL: Benchmarks, Applications, Use Cases, and Challenges6 Dec 2024
- 2024BEAVER: An Enterprise Benchmark for Text-to-SQL3 Sep 2024
- 2023Semantic Decomposition of Question and SQL for Text-to-SQL Parsing20 Oct 2023
- 2023Battle of the Large Language Models: Dolly vs LLaMA vs Vicuna vs Guanaco vs Bard vs ChatGPT -- A Text-to-SQL Parsing Comparison16 Oct 2023
- 2023Selective Demonstrations for Cross-domain Text-to-SQL10 Oct 2023
- 2023Adapt and Decompose: Efficient Generalization of Text-to-SQL via Domain Adapted Least-To-Most Prompting1 Aug 2023