mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finding the Pillars of Strength for Multi-Head Attention

arXiv 2305.14380 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LG cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent studies have revealed some issues of Multi-Head Attention (MHA), e.g., redundancy and over-parameterization. Specifically, the heads of MHA were originally designed to attend to information from different representation subspaces, whereas prior studies found that some attention heads likely learn similar features and can be pruned without harming performance. Inspired by the minimum-redundancy feature selection, we assume that focusing on the most representative and distinctive features with minimum resources can mitigate the above issues and lead to more effective and efficient MHAs. In particular, we propose Grouped Head Attention, trained with a self-supervised group constraint that group attention heads, where each group focuses on an essential but distinctive feature subset. We additionally propose a Voting-to-Stay procedure to remove redundant heads, thus achieving a transformer with lighter weights. Moreover, our method achieves significant performance gains on three well-established tasks while considerably compressing parameters.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

25 of 39 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  4. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  5. 2021Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spacescited by 2,465
  6. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  7. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  8. 2019Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Prunedcited by 856
  9. 2019Are Sixteen Heads Really Better than One?cited by 816
  10. 2017Regularizing Neural Networks by Penalizing Confident Output Distributionscited by 464
  11. 2017A Deep Reinforced Model for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 365
  12. 2018Adaptive Input Representations for Neural Language Modelingcited by 226
13 more
  1. 2019Pay Less Attention with Lightweight and Dynamic Convolutionscited by 211
  2. 2020Lite Transformer with Long-Short Range Attentioncited by 127
  3. 2017Controllable Abstractive Summarizationcited by 110
  4. 2019Augmenting Self-attention with Persistent Memorycited by 93
  5. 2020Talking-Heads Attentioncited by 62
  6. 2020Multi-Head Attention: Collaborate Instead of Concatenatecited by 60
  7. 2017Massive Exploration of Neural Machine Translation Architecturescited by 55
  8. 2017Classical Structured Prediction Losses for Sequence to Sequence Learningcited by 55
  9. 2021Differentiable Subset Pruning of Transformer Headscited by 47
  10. 2019Language Models with Transformerscited by 36
  11. 2018Multi-Head Attention with Disagreement Regularizationcited by 35
  12. 2017Weighted Transformer Network for Machine Translationcited by 16
  13. 2019Information Aggregation for Multi-Head Attention with Routing-by-Agreementcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.