Evaluating Model Performance in Medical Datasets Over Time
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning (ML) models deployed in healthcare systems must face data drawn from continually evolving environments. However, researchers proposing such models typically evaluate them in a time-agnostic manner, splitting datasets according to patients sampled randomly throughout the entire study time period. This work proposes the Evaluation on Medical Datasets Over Time (EMDOT) framework, which evaluates the performance of a model class across time. Inspired by the concept of backtesting, EMDOT simulates possible training procedures that practitioners might have been able to execute at each point in time and evaluates the resulting models on all future time points. Evaluating both linear and more complex models on six distinct medical data sources (tabular and imaging), we show how depending on the dataset, using all historical data may be ideal in many cases, whereas using a window of the most recent data could be advantageous in others. In datasets where models suffer from sudden degradations in performance, we investigate plausible explanations for these shocks. We release the EMDOT package to help facilitate further works in deployment-oriented evaluation over time.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.
Builds on
13 of 51 references.
References · 13
- 2019MIMIC-CXR-JPG, a large publicly available database of labeled chest radiographscited by 597
- 2020Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learningcited by 496
- 2018Detecting and Correcting for Label Shift with Black Box Predictorscited by 366
- 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
- 2020A Unified View of Label Shift Estimationcited by 119
- 2015Learning to Diagnose with LSTM Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 99
- 2019Evaluating time series forecasting models: An empirical study on performance estimation methodscited by 53
- 2019Feature Robustness in Non-stationary Health Records: Caveats to Deployable Model Performance in Common Clinical Machine Learning Taskscited by 39
- 2022Domain Adaptation under Missingness Shiftcited by 13
- 2020Uncertainty-Aware Lookahead Factor Models for Quantitative Investingcited by 8
- 2017Improving Factor-Based Quantitative Investing by Forecasting Company Fundamentalscited by 5
- 2020Treatment Policy Learning in Multiobjective Settings with Fully Observed Outcomescited by 2
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024What Do Machine Learning Researchers Mean by "Reproducible"?cited by 9
- 2024Time Matters: Examine Temporal Effects on Biomedical Language Modelscited by 7
- 2023MoCo-Transfer: Investigating out-of-distribution contrastive learning for limited-data domainscited by 3
- 2025Can We Reliably Rank Model Performance across Domains without Labeled Data?cited by 0
- 2025Can We Reliably Rank Model Performance across Domains without Labeled Data?10 Oct 2025
- 2024What Do Machine Learning Researchers Mean by "Reproducible"?5 Dec 2024
- 2024Time Matters: Examine Temporal Effects on Biomedical Language Models24 Jul 2024
- 2023MoCo-Transfer: Investigating out-of-distribution contrastive learning for limited-data domains15 Nov 2023