mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

SPARSEFIT: Few-shot Prompting with Sparse Fine-tuning for Jointly Generating Predictions and Natural Language Explanations

arXiv 2305.13235 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Models that generate natural language explanations (NLEs) for their predictions have recently gained increasing interest. However, this approach usually demands large datasets of human-written NLEs for the ground-truth answers at training time, which can be expensive and potentially infeasible for some applications. When only a few NLEs are available (a few-shot setup), fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs) in conjunction with prompt-based learning has recently shown promising results. However, PLMs typically have billions of parameters, making full fine-tuning expensive. We propose SparseFit, a sparse few-shot fine-tuning strategy that leverages discrete prompts to jointly generate predictions and NLEs. We experiment with SparseFit on three sizes of the T5 language model and four datasets and compare it against existing state-of-the-art Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) techniques. We find that fine-tuning only 6.8% of the model parameters leads to competitive results for both the task performance and the quality of the generated NLEs compared to full fine-tuning of the model and produces better results on average than other PEFT methods in terms of predictive accuracy and NLE quality.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

50 of 69 references.

References · 50

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,304
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,320
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,549
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,231
  5. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  6. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,624
  7. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,480
  8. 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,317
  9. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  10. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,870
  11. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,213
  12. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,898
38 more
  1. 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,676
  2. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,251
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,229
  4. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,805
  5. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,455
  6. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,240
  7. 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 947
  8. 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 891
  9. 2019Unified Language Model Pre-training for Natural Language Understanding and Generationcited by 670
  10. 2017Program Induction by Rationale Generation : Learning to Solve and Explain Algebraic Word Problemscited by 646
  11. 2019Green AIcited by 623
  12. 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
  13. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  14. 2018Meta-Learning for Semi-Supervised Few-Shot Classificationcited by 456
  15. 2019Social Bias Frames: Reasoning about Social and Power Implications of Languagecited by 378
  16. 2017Few-Shot Learning with Graph Neural Networkscited by 324
  17. 2018Textual Explanations for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 226
  18. 2017SMASH: One-Shot Model Architecture Search through HyperNetworkscited by 201
  19. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  20. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 160
  21. 2020WT5?! Training Text-to-Text Models to Explain their Predictionscited by 148
  22. 2021Cutting Down on Prompts and Parameters: Simple Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 139
  23. 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
  24. 2018Grounding Visual Explanationscited by 92
  25. 2021e-ViL: A Dataset and Benchmark for Natural Language Explanations in Vision-Language Taskscited by 84
  26. 2021Few-Shot Self-Rationalization with Natural Language Promptscited by 83
  27. 2022Pathways: Asynchronous Distributed Dataflow for MLcited by 82
  28. 2019AllenNLP Interpret: A Framework for Explaining Predictions of NLP Modelscited by 74
  29. 2019Make Up Your Mind! Adversarial Generation of Inconsistent Natural Language Explanationscited by 71
  30. 2020Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphscited by 46
  31. 2019Does It Make Sense? And Why? A Pilot Study for Sense Making and Explanationcited by 43
  32. 2017Rationalization: A Neural Machine Translation Approach to Generating Natural Language Explanationscited by 37
  33. 2022Explaining Chest X-ray Pathologies in Natural Languagecited by 27
  34. 2020Learning from the Best: Rationalizing Prediction by Adversarial Information Calibrationcited by 25
  35. 2021Knowledge-Grounded Self-Rationalization via Extractive and Natural Language Explanationscited by 24
  36. 2021Generate Natural Language Explanations for Recommendationcited by 23
  37. 2021Few-Shot Out-of-Domain Transfer Learning of Natural Language Explanations in a Label-Abundant Setupcited by 16
  38. 2020The Struggles of Feature-Based Explanations: Shapley Values vs. Minimal Sufficient Subsetscited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.