mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Partitioning Forecaster

arXiv 2305.13063 ↗First posted 22 May 2023cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we consider a new family of algorithms for sequential prediction, Hierarchical Partitioning Forecasters (HPFs). Our goal is to provide appealing theoretical - regret guarantees on a powerful model class - and practical - empirical performance comparable to deep networks - properties at the same time. We built upon three principles: hierarchically partitioning the feature space into sub-spaces, blending forecasters specialized to each sub-space and learning HPFs via local online learning applied to these individual forecasters. Following these principles allows us to obtain regret guarantees, where Constant Partitioning Forecasters (CPFs) serve as competitor. A CPF partitions the feature space into sub-spaces and predicts with a fixed forecaster per sub-space. Fixing a hierarchical partition mathcal H and considering any CPF with a partition that can be constructed using elements of mathcal H we provide two guarantees: first, a generic one that unveils how local online learning determines regret of learning the entire HPF online; second, a concrete instance that considers HPF with linear forecasters (LHPF) and exp-concave losses where we obtain O(k log T) regret for sequences of length T where k is a measure of complexity for the competing CPF. Finally, we provide experiments that compare LHPF to various baselines, including state of the art deep learning models, in precipitation nowcasting. Our results indicate that LHPF is competitive in various settings.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 May 2023.

Builds on

4 of 12 references.

References · 4

  1. 2021Skillful Precipitation Nowcasting using Deep Generative Models of Radarcited by 308
  2. 2019Gated Linear Networkscited by 26
  3. 2020Gaussian Gated Linear Networkscited by 6
  4. 2013Cover Tree Bayesian Reinforcement Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.