mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Survey of Automatic Plankton Image Recognition: Challenges, Existing Solutions and Future Perspectives

arXiv 2305.11739 ↗First posted 19 May 2023cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Planktonic organisms are key components of aquatic ecosystems and respond quickly to changes in the environment, therefore their monitoring is vital to understand the changes in the environment. Yet, monitoring plankton at appropriate scales still remains a challenge, limiting our understanding of functioning of aquatic systems and their response to changes. Modern plankton imaging instruments can be utilized to sample at high frequencies, enabling novel possibilities to study plankton populations. However, manual analysis of the data is costly, time consuming and expert based, making such approach unsuitable for large-scale application and urging for automatic solutions. The key problem related to the utilization of plankton datasets through image analysis is plankton recognition. Despite the large amount of research done, automatic methods have not been widely adopted for operational use. In this paper, a comprehensive survey on existing solutions for automatic plankton recognition is presented. First, we identify the most notable challenges that that make the development of plankton recognition systems difficult. Then, we provide a detailed description of solutions for these challenges proposed in plankton recognition literature. Finally, we propose a workflow to identify the specific challenges in new datasets and the recommended approaches to address them. For many of the challenges, applicable solutions exist. However, important challenges remain unsolved: 1) the domain shift between the datasets hindering the development of a general plankton recognition system that would work across different imaging instruments, 2) the difficulty to identify and process the images of previously unseen classes, and 3) the uncertainty in expert annotations that affects the training of the machine learning models for recognition. These challenges should be addressed in the future research.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 54 of its 334 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 May 2023.

Builds on

54 of 334 references.

References · 54

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
  6. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  9. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  10. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  11. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  12. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
38 more
  1. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  2. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  3. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  4. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  5. 2015Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 2,048
  6. 2017Enhanced Deep Residual Networks for Single Image Super-Resolutioncited by 1,543
  7. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,509
  8. 2017Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognitioncited by 1,097
  9. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  10. 2016SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model sizecited by 1,054
  11. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  12. 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
  13. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 760
  14. 2014Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognitioncited by 719
  15. 2020Deep Learning for Person Re-identification: A Survey and Outlookcited by 547
  16. 2015Towards Open Set Deep Networkscited by 533
  17. 2017Fine-tuning CNN Image Retrieval with No Human Annotationcited by 497
  18. 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
  19. 2018A Survey of Unsupervised Deep Domain Adaptationcited by 361
  20. 2015Recent Advances in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 360
  21. 2018Recent Advances in Open Set Recognition: A Surveycited by 309
  22. 2017No Fuss Distance Metric Learning using Proxiescited by 225
  23. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 165
  24. 2016Deep Pyramidal Residual Networkscited by 163
  25. 2018The Contextual Loss for Image Transformation with Non-Aligned Datacited by 135
  26. 2020A Decade Survey of Content Based Image Retrieval using Deep Learningcited by 72
  27. 2019Data Augmentation Using GANscited by 58
  28. 2017Is Second-order Information Helpful for Large-scale Visual Recognition?cited by 44
  29. 2016Learning scale-variant and scale-invariant features for deep image classificationcited by 20
  30. 2015WHOI-Plankton- A Large Scale Fine Grained Visual Recognition Benchmark Dataset for Plankton Classificationcited by 17
  31. 2021Applications of Artificial Neural Networks in Microorganism Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review from Conventional Multilayer Perceptron to Popular Convolutional Neural Network and Potential Visual Transformercited by 14
  32. 2020Beyond Cats and Dogs: Semi-supervised Classification of fuzzy labels with overclusteringcited by 11
  33. 2019Few-shot Learning for Domain-specific Fine-grained Image Classificationcited by 10
  34. 2022Ensembles of Vision Transformers as a New Paradigm for Automated Classification in Ecologycited by 10
  35. 2020MorphoCluster: Efficient Annotation of Plankton images by Clusteringcited by 9
  36. 2021Deep Learning Classification of Lake Zooplanktoncited by 8
  37. 2015Quantification in-the-wild: data-sets and baselinescited by 6
  38. 2019Deep learning for Plankton and Coral Classificationcited by 6

50 most cited of 54 All 54 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

6 papers.